sync
This commit is contained in:
parent
21f9a7f69b
commit
2b5963090f
48
TODO
48
TODO
@ -1,3 +1,51 @@
|
|||||||
|
- im_fwfft() does not set interpreation to fourier
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- seems to do a lot of looping?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
$ vips --vips-progress im_fwfft Gugg_coloured.jpg x.v
|
||||||
|
vips fwfft1:1: 2 threads, 972 x 16 tiles, groups of 64 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips temp-6: 2 threads, 972 x 16 tiles, groups of 64 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips temp-6: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
vips fwfft1:1: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
vips fft: 2 threads, 128 x 128 tiles, groups of 256 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips fft: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
vips fwfft1:1: 2 threads, 972 x 16 tiles, groups of 64 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips fwfft1:1: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
vips fft: 2 threads, 128 x 128 tiles, groups of 256 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips fft: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
vips fwfft1:1: 2 threads, 972 x 16 tiles, groups of 64 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips fwfft1:1: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
vips fft: 2 threads, 128 x 128 tiles, groups of 256 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips fft: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
vips im__fftproc: 2 threads, 128 x 128 tiles, groups of 256 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips im__fftproc: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
vips x.v: 2 threads, 128 x 128 tiles, groups of 256 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips x.v: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
that's 8 separate loops over the image
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- viewing an image tagged as fourier in nip2 is broken, which operation is
|
||||||
|
failing?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- im_invfftr() is broken
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
$ vips im_fwfft Gugg_coloured.jpg x.v
|
||||||
|
$ vips --vips-progress im_invfftr x.v x2.v
|
||||||
|
vips invfft1-1: 2 threads, 972 x 1 tiles, groups of 4 scanlines
|
||||||
|
vips invfft1-1: done in 0s
|
||||||
|
Segmentation fault
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
add a test to the suite
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- we have VipsArrayObject and also vips_object_local_array()
|
- we have VipsArrayObject and also vips_object_local_array()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
can we make one use the other?
|
can we make one use the other?
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user