From 2bb7844f4c2dabd914f38f0588efcd783316b8ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Cupitt Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:53:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] update docs some old stuff in examples --- doc/using-cpp.xml | 4 ++-- doc/using-threads.xml | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/using-cpp.xml b/doc/using-cpp.xml index 4e6d6d7b..a5fb9d39 100644 --- a/doc/using-cpp.xml +++ b/doc/using-cpp.xml @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ main( int argc, char **argv ) VImage in = VImage::new_from_file( argv[1], VImage::option()-> - set( "access", VIPS_ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL_UNBUFFERED ) ); + set( "access", VIPS_ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL ) ); double avg = in.avg(); @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ main( int argc, char **argv ) VImage in = VImage::new_from_file( argv[1], VImage::option()-> - set( "access", VIPS_ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL_UNBUFFERED ) ); + set( "access", VIPS_ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL ) ); VImage out = in.embed( 10, 10, 1000, 1000, VImage::option()-> diff --git a/doc/using-threads.xml b/doc/using-threads.xml index b00c6e79..01fb2f2e 100644 --- a/doc/using-threads.xml +++ b/doc/using-threads.xml @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ This makes error handling very simple but the obvious downside is that - because error returns and error messages are separate when you + because error returns and error messages are separate, when you detect an error return you can't be sure that what's in the error buffer is the message that matches your error. @@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ test (const char *filename) snprintf (output_file, 256, "x/tmp-%p.jpg", g_thread_self ()); if (!(im = vips_image_new_from_file (filename, - "access", - VIPS_ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL_UNBUFFERED, + "access", VIPS_ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL, NULL))) return (-1);