diff --git a/include/vips/Makefile.am b/include/vips/Makefile.am index 5fc0eb4f..db402776 100644 --- a/include/vips/Makefile.am +++ b/include/vips/Makefile.am @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ pkginclude_HEADERS = \ version.h \ vips.h \ yafr.h \ + yafrtest.h \ vips \ intl.h \ buf.h \ diff --git a/include/vips/vips.h b/include/vips/vips.h index ac6586f7..fc1df377 100644 --- a/include/vips/vips.h +++ b/include/vips/vips.h @@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ typedef struct { #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include diff --git a/include/vips/yafrtest.h b/include/vips/yafrtest.h new file mode 100644 index 00000000..52960a8d --- /dev/null +++ b/include/vips/yafrtest.h @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +/* YAFR_TEST interpolator. + */ + +/* + + This file is part of VIPS. + + VIPS is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by + the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or + (at your option) any later version. + + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License + along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software + Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA + + */ + +/* + + These files are distributed with VIPS - http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk + + */ + +#ifndef VIPS_YAFR_TEST_H +#define VIPS_YAFR_TEST_H + +#ifdef __cplusplus +extern "C" { +#endif /*__cplusplus*/ + +#define VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST (vips_interpolate_yafr_test_get_type()) +#define VIPS_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST( obj ) \ + (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST( (obj), \ + VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST, VipsInterpolateYafrTest )) +#define VIPS_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST_CLASS( klass ) \ + (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_CAST( (klass), \ + VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST, VipsInterpolateYafrTestClass)) +#define VIPS_IS_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST( obj ) \ + (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_TYPE( (obj), VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST )) +#define VIPS_IS_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST_CLASS( klass ) \ + (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_TYPE( (klass), VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST )) +#define VIPS_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST_GET_CLASS( obj ) \ + (G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_CLASS( (obj), \ + VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST, VipsInterpolateYafrTestClass )) + +typedef struct _VipsInterpolateYafrTest { + VipsInterpolate parent_object; + + /* "sharpening" is a continuous method parameter which is + * proportional to the amount of "diagonal straightening" which the + * nonlinear correction part of the method may add to the underlying + * linear scheme. You may also think of it as a sharpening + * parameter: higher values correspond to more sharpening, and + * negative values lead to strange looking effects. + * + * The default value is sharpening = 29/32 when the scheme being + * "straightened" is Catmull-Rom---as is the case here. This value + * fixes key pixel values near the diagonal boundary between two + * monochrome regions (the diagonal boundary pixel values being set + * to the halfway colour). + * + * If resampling seems to add unwanted texture artifacts, push + * sharpening toward 0. It is not generally not recommended to set + * sharpening to a value larger than 4. + * + * Sharpening is halved because the .5 which has to do with the + * relative coordinates of the evaluation points (which has to do + * with .5*rite_width etc) is folded into the constant to save + * flops. Consequently, the largest recommended value of + * sharpening_over_two is 2=4/2. + * + * In order to simplify interfacing with users, the parameter which + * should be set by the user is normalized so that user_sharpening = + * 1 when sharpening is equal to the recommended value. Consistently + * with the above discussion, values of user_sharpening between 0 + * and about 3.625 give good results. + */ + double sharpening; +} VipsInterpolateYafrTest; + +typedef struct _VipsInterpolateYafrTestClass { + VipsInterpolateClass parent_class; + +} VipsInterpolateYafrTestClass; + +GType vips_interpolate_yafr_test_get_type( void ); +VipsInterpolate *vips_interpolate_yafr_test_new( void ); +void vips_interpolate_yafr_test_set_sharpening( VipsInterpolateYafrTest *, + double sharpening ); + +/* Convenience: return a static default yafr_test, so no need to free it. + */ +VipsInterpolate *vips_interpolate_yafr_test_static( void ); + +#ifdef __cplusplus +} +#endif /*__cplusplus*/ + +#endif /*VIPS_YAFR_TEST_H*/ + diff --git a/libsrc/mosaicing/Makefile.am b/libsrc/mosaicing/Makefile.am index 93be8386..92a4f76e 100644 --- a/libsrc/mosaicing/Makefile.am +++ b/libsrc/mosaicing/Makefile.am @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ libmosaicing_la_SOURCES = \ im_clinear.c \ interpolate.c \ yafr.c \ + yafrtest.c \ im_improve.c \ im_initialize.c \ im_lrcalcon.c \ diff --git a/libsrc/mosaicing/yafrtest.c b/libsrc/mosaicing/yafrtest.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1f96006e --- /dev/null +++ b/libsrc/mosaicing/yafrtest.c @@ -0,0 +1,679 @@ +/* vipsinterpolateyafr_test ... yarf as a vips interpolate class + */ + +/* + + This file is part of VIPS. + + VIPS is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by + the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or + (at your option) any later version. + + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License + along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software + Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA + + */ + +/* + + These files are distributed with VIPS - http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk + + */ + +/* +#define DEBUG + */ + +#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H +#include +#endif /*HAVE_CONFIG_H*/ +#include + +#include +#include + +#include +#include + +#ifdef WITH_DMALLOC +#include +#endif /*WITH_DMALLOC*/ + +/* "fast" floor() ... on my laptop, anyway. + */ +#define FLOOR( V ) ((V) >= 0 ? (int)(V) : (int)((V) - 1)) + +static VipsInterpolateClass *vips_interpolate_yafr_test_parent_class = NULL; + +/* Copy-paste of gegl-sampler-yafr_test-smooth.c starts + */ + +/* + * 2008 (c) Nicolas Robidoux (developer of Yet Another Fast + * Resampler). + * + * Acknowledgement: N. Robidoux's research on YAFR_TEST funded in part by + * an NSERC (National Science and Engineering Research Council of + * Canada) Discovery Grant. + */ + +#ifndef restrict +#ifdef __restrict +#define restrict __restrict +#else +#ifdef __restrict__ +#define restrict __restrict__ +#else +#define restrict +#endif +#endif +#endif + +#ifndef unlikely +#ifdef __builtin_expect +#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect((x),0) +#else +#define unlikely(x) (x) +#endif +#endif + +/* + * YAFR_TEST = Yet Another Fast Resampler + * + * Yet Another Fast Resampler is a nonlinear resampler which consists + * of a linear scheme (in this version, Catmull-Rom) plus a nonlinear + * sharpening correction the purpose of which is the straightening of + * diagonal interfaces between flat colour areas. + * + * Key properties: + * + * YAFR_TEST (smooth) is interpolatory: + * + * If asked for the value at the center of an input pixel, it will + * return the corresponding value, unchanged. + * + * YAFR_TEST (smooth) preserves local averages: + * + * The average of the reconstructed intensity surface over any region + * is the same as the average of the piecewise constant surface with + * values over pixel areas equal to the input pixel values (the + * "nearest neighbour" surface), except for a small amount of blur at + * the boundary of the region. More precicely: YAFR_TEST (smooth) is a box + * filtered exact area method. + * + * Main weaknesses of YAFR_TEST (smooth): + * + * Weakness 1: YAFR_TEST (smooth) improves on Catmull-Rom only for images + * with at least a little bit of smoothness. + * + * Weakness 2: Catmull-Rom introduces a lot of haloing. YAFR_TEST (smooth) + * is based on Catmull-Rom, and consequently it too introduces a lot + * of haloing. + * + * More details regarding Weakness 1: + * + * If a portion of the image is such that every pixel has immediate + * neighbours in the horizontal and vertical directions which have + * exactly the same pixel value, then YAFR_TEST (smooth) boils down to + * Catmull-Rom, and the computation of the correction is a waste. + * Extreme case: If all the pixels are either pure black or pure white + * in some region, as in some text images (more generally, if the + * region is "bichromatic"), then the YAFR_TEST (smooth) correction is 0 in + * the interior of the bichromatic region. + */ + +/* Pointers to write to / read from, how much to add to move right a pixel, + * how much to add to move down a line. + */ + +static inline void +catrom_yafr_test (float* restrict out, const float* restrict in, + const int channels, + const int pixels_per_buffer_row, + const float sharpening, + + const float cardinal_one, + const float cardinal_two, + const float cardinal_thr, + const float cardinal_fou, + const float cardinal_uno, + const float cardinal_dos, + const float cardinal_tre, + const float cardinal_qua, + const float left_width_times_up__height_times_rite_width, + const float left_width_times_dow_height_times_rite_width, + const float left_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height, + const float rite_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height) +{ + + /* "sharpening" is a continuous method parameter which is + * proportional to the amount of "diagonal straightening" which the + * nonlinear correction part of the method may add to the underlying + * linear scheme. You may also think of it as a sharpening + * parameter: higher values correspond to more sharpening, and + * negative values lead to strange looking effects. + * + * The default value is sharpening = 29/32 when the scheme being + * "straightened" is Catmull-Rom---as is the case here. This value + * fixes key pixel values near the diagonal boundary between two + * monochrome regions (the diagonal boundary pixel values being set + * to the halfway colour). + * + * If resampling seems to add unwanted texture artifacts, push + * sharpening toward 0. It is not generally not recommended to set + * sharpening to a value larger than 4. + * + * Sharpening is halved because the .5 which has to do with the + * relative coordinates of the evaluation points (which has to do + * with .5*rite_width etc) is folded into the constant to save + * flops. Consequently, the largest recommended value of + * sharpening_over_two is 2=4/2. + * + * In order to simplify interfacing with users, the parameter which + * should be set by the user is normalized so that user_sharpening = + * 1 when sharpening is equal to the recommended value. Consistently + * with the above discussion, values of user_sharpening between 0 + * and about 3.625 give good results. + */ + + const float sharpening_over_two = sharpening * 0.453125f; + + /* + * The input pixel values are described by the following stencil. + * Spanish abbreviations are used to label positions from top to + * bottom, English ones to label positions from left to right,: + * + * (ix-1,iy-1) (ix,iy-1) (ix+1,iy-1) (ix+2,iy-1) + * =uno_one =uno_two =uno_thr = uno_fou + * + * (ix-1,iy) (ix,iy) (ix+1,iy) (ix+2,iy) + * =dos_one =dos_two =dos_thr = dos_fou + * + * (ix-1,iy+1) (ix,iy+1) (ix+1,iy+1) (ix+2,iy+1) + * =tre_one =tre_two =tre_thr = tre_fou + * + * (ix-1,iy+2) (ix,iy+2) (ix+1,iy+2) (ix+2,iy+2) + * =qua_one =qua_two =qua_thr = qua_fou + */ + + /* + * Load the useful pixel values for the channel under + * consideration. The in pointer is assumed + * to point to uno_one when catrom_yafr_test is entered. + */ + const float uno_one = in[ 0 ]; + const float uno_two = in[ channels ]; + const float uno_thr = in[ 2 * channels ]; + const float uno_fou = in[ 3 * channels ]; + + const float dos_one = in[ pixels_per_buffer_row * channels ]; + const float dos_two = in[ ( 1 + pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + const float dos_thr = in[ ( 2 + pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + const float dos_fou = in[ ( 3 + pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + + const float tre_one = in[ 2 * pixels_per_buffer_row * channels ]; + const float tre_two = in[ ( 1 + 2 * pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + const float tre_thr = in[ ( 2 + 2 * pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + const float tre_fou = in[ ( 3 + 2 * pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + + const float qua_one = in[ 3 * pixels_per_buffer_row * channels ]; + const float qua_two = in[ ( 1 + 3 * pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + const float qua_thr = in[ ( 2 + 3 * pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + const float qua_fou = in[ ( 3 + 3 * pixels_per_buffer_row ) * channels ]; + + /* + * Computation of the YAFR_TEST correction: + * + * Basically, if two consecutive pixel value differences have the + * same sign, the smallest one (in absolute value) is taken to be + * the corresponding slope. If they don't have the same sign, the + * corresponding slope is set to 0. + * + * Four such pairs (vertical and horizontal) of slopes need to be + * computed, one pair for each of the pixels which potentially + * overlap the unit area centered at the interpolation point. + */ + /* + * Beginning of the computation of the "up" horizontal slopes: + */ + const float prem__up = dos_two - dos_one; + const float deux__up = dos_thr - dos_two; + const float troi__up = dos_fou - dos_thr; + /* + * "down" horizontal slopes: + */ + const float prem_dow = tre_two - tre_one; + const float deux_dow = tre_thr - tre_two; + const float troi_dow = tre_fou - tre_thr; + /* + * "left" vertical slopes: + */ + const float prem_left = dos_two - uno_two; + const float deux_left = tre_two - dos_two; + const float troi_left = qua_two - tre_two; + /* + * "right" vertical slopes: + */ + const float prem_rite = dos_thr - uno_thr; + const float deux_rite = tre_thr - dos_thr; + const float troi_rite = qua_thr - tre_thr; + + /* + * Back to "up": + */ + const float prem__up_squared = prem__up * prem__up; + const float deux__up_squared = deux__up * deux__up; + const float troi__up_squared = troi__up * troi__up; + /* + * Back to "down": + */ + const float prem_dow_squared = prem_dow * prem_dow; + const float deux_dow_squared = deux_dow * deux_dow; + const float troi_dow_squared = troi_dow * troi_dow; + /* + * Back to "left": + */ + const float prem_left_squared = prem_left * prem_left; + const float deux_left_squared = deux_left * deux_left; + const float troi_left_squared = troi_left * troi_left; + /* + * Back to "right": + */ + const float prem_rite_squared = prem_rite * prem_rite; + const float deux_rite_squared = deux_rite * deux_rite; + const float troi_rite_squared = troi_rite * troi_rite; + + /* + * "up": + */ + const float prem__up_times_deux__up = prem__up * deux__up; + const float deux__up_times_troi__up = deux__up * troi__up; + /* + * "down": + */ + const float prem_dow_times_deux_dow = prem_dow * deux_dow; + const float deux_dow_times_troi_dow = deux_dow * troi_dow; + /* + * "left": + */ + const float prem_left_times_deux_left = prem_left * deux_left; + const float deux_left_times_troi_left = deux_left * troi_left; + /* + * "right": + */ + const float prem_rite_times_deux_rite = prem_rite * deux_rite; + const float deux_rite_times_troi_rite = deux_rite * troi_rite; + + /* + * Branching parts of the computation of the YAFR_TEST correction (could + * be unbranched using arithmetic branching and C99 math intrinsics, + * although the compiler may be smart enough to remove the branching + * on its own): + */ + /* + * "up": + */ + const float prem__up_vs_deux__up = + prem__up_squared < deux__up_squared ? prem__up : deux__up; + const float deux__up_vs_troi__up = + deux__up_squared < troi__up_squared ? deux__up : troi__up; + /* + * "down": + */ + const float prem_dow_vs_deux_dow = + prem_dow_squared < deux_dow_squared ? prem_dow : deux_dow; + const float deux_dow_vs_troi_dow = + deux_dow_squared < troi_dow_squared ? deux_dow : troi_dow; + /* + * "left": + */ + const float prem_left_vs_deux_left = + prem_left_squared < deux_left_squared ? prem_left : deux_left; + const float deux_left_vs_troi_left = + deux_left_squared < troi_left_squared ? deux_left : troi_left; + /* + * "right": + */ + const float prem_rite_vs_deux_rite = + prem_rite_squared < deux_rite_squared ? prem_rite : deux_rite; + const float deux_rite_vs_troi_rite = + deux_rite_squared < troi_rite_squared ? deux_rite : troi_rite; + /* + * The YAFR_TEST correction computation will resume after the computation + * of the Catmull-Rom baseline. + */ + + /* + * Catmull-Rom baseline contribution: + */ + const float catmull_rom = + cardinal_uno * + ( + cardinal_one * uno_one + + + cardinal_two * uno_two + + + cardinal_thr * uno_thr + + + cardinal_fou * uno_fou + ) + + + cardinal_dos * + ( + cardinal_one * dos_one + + + cardinal_two * dos_two + + + cardinal_thr * dos_thr + + + cardinal_fou * dos_fou + ) + + + cardinal_tre * + ( + cardinal_one * tre_one + + + cardinal_two * tre_two + + + cardinal_thr * tre_thr + + + cardinal_fou * tre_fou + ) + + + cardinal_qua * + ( + cardinal_one * qua_one + + + cardinal_two * qua_two + + + cardinal_thr * qua_thr + + + cardinal_fou * qua_fou + ); + + /* + * Computation of the YAFR_TEST slopes. + */ + /* + * "up": + */ + const float mx_left__up = + prem__up_times_deux__up < 0.f ? 0.f : prem__up_vs_deux__up; + const float mx_rite__up = + deux__up_times_troi__up < 0.f ? 0.f : deux__up_vs_troi__up; + /* + * "down": + */ + const float mx_left_dow = + prem_dow_times_deux_dow < 0.f ? 0.f : prem_dow_vs_deux_dow; + const float mx_rite_dow = + deux_dow_times_troi_dow < 0.f ? 0.f : deux_dow_vs_troi_dow; + /* + * "left": + */ + const float my_left__up = + prem_left_times_deux_left < 0.f ? 0.f : prem_left_vs_deux_left; + const float my_left_dow = + deux_left_times_troi_left < 0.f ? 0.f : deux_left_vs_troi_left; + /* + * "right": + */ + const float my_rite__up = + prem_rite_times_deux_rite < 0.f ? 0.f : prem_rite_vs_deux_rite; + const float my_rite_dow = + deux_rite_times_troi_rite < 0.f ? 0.f : deux_rite_vs_troi_rite; + + /* + * Assemble the unweighted YAFR_TEST correction: + */ + const float unweighted_yafr_test_correction = + left_width_times_up__height_times_rite_width + * + ( mx_left__up - mx_rite__up ) + + + left_width_times_dow_height_times_rite_width + * + ( mx_left_dow - mx_rite_dow ) + + + left_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height + * + ( my_left__up - my_left_dow ) + + + rite_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height + * + ( my_rite__up - my_rite_dow ); + + /* + * Add the Catmull-Rom baseline and the weighted YAFR_TEST correction: + */ + const float newval = + sharpening_over_two * unweighted_yafr_test_correction + catmull_rom; + + *out = newval; +} + +static void +vips_interpolate_yafr_test_interpolate( VipsInterpolate *interpolate, + REGION *out, REGION *in, + int out_x, int out_y, double x, double y ) +{ + VipsInterpolateYafrTest *yafr_test = VIPS_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST( interpolate ); + + /* + * Note: The computation is structured to foster software + * pipelining. + */ + + /* + * x is understood to increase from left to right, y, from top to + * bottom. Consequently, ix and iy are the indices of the pixel + * located at or to the left, and at or above. the sampling point. + * + * floor is used to make sure that the transition through 0 is + * smooth. If it is known that negative x and y will never be used, + * cast (which truncates) could be used instead. + */ + const gint ix = FLOOR (x); + const gint iy = FLOOR (y); + + /* + * Each (channel's) output pixel value is obtained by combining four + * "pieces," each piece corresponding to the set of points which are + * closest to the four pixels closest to the (x,y) position, pixel + * positions which have coordinates and labels as follows: + * + * (ix,iy) (ix+1,iy) + * =left__up =rite__up + * + * <- (x,y) is somewhere in the convex hull + * + * (ix,iy+1) (ix+1,iy+1) + * =left_dow =rite_dow + */ + /* + * rite_width is the width of the overlaps of the unit averaging box + * (which is centered at the position where an interpolated value is + * desired), with the closest unit pixel areas to the right. + * + * left_width is the width of the overlaps of the unit averaging box + * (which is centered at the position where an interpolated value is + * desired), with the closest unit pixel areas to the left. + */ + const float rite_width = x - ix; + const float dow_height = y - iy; + const float left_width = 1.f - rite_width; + const float up__height = 1.f - dow_height; + /* + * .5*rite_width is the x-coordinate of the center of the overlap of + * the averaging box with the left pixel areas, relative to the + * position of the centers of the left pixels. + * + * -.5*left_width is the x-coordinate ... right pixel areas, + * relative to ... the right pixels. + * + * .5*dow_height is the y-coordinate of the center of the overlap + * of the averaging box with the up pixel areas, relative to the + * position of the centers of the up pixels. + * + * -.5*up__height is the y-coordinate ... down pixel areas, relative + * to ... the down pixels. + */ + const float left_width_times_rite_width = left_width * rite_width; + const float up__height_times_dow_height = up__height * dow_height; + + const float cardinal_two = + left_width_times_rite_width * ( -1.5f * rite_width + 1.f ) + + left_width; + const float cardinal_dos = + up__height_times_dow_height * ( -1.5f * dow_height + 1.f ) + + up__height; + + const float minus_half_left_width_times_rite_width = + -.5f * left_width_times_rite_width; + const float minus_half_up__height_times_dow_height = + -.5f * up__height_times_dow_height; + + const float left_width_times_up__height_times_rite_width = + left_width_times_rite_width * up__height; + const float left_width_times_dow_height_times_rite_width = + left_width_times_rite_width * dow_height; + const float left_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height = + up__height_times_dow_height * left_width; + const float rite_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height = + up__height_times_dow_height * rite_width; + + const float cardinal_one = + minus_half_left_width_times_rite_width * left_width; + const float cardinal_uno = + minus_half_up__height_times_dow_height * up__height; + + const float cardinal_fou = + minus_half_left_width_times_rite_width * rite_width; + const float cardinal_qua = + minus_half_up__height_times_dow_height * dow_height; + + const float cardinal_thr = + 1.f - ( minus_half_left_width_times_rite_width + cardinal_two ); + const float cardinal_tre = + 1.f - ( minus_half_up__height_times_dow_height + cardinal_dos ); + + /* + * Set the tile pointer to the first relevant value. Since the + * pointer initially points to dos_two, we need to rewind it one + * tile row, then go back one additional pixel. + */ + const PEL *p = (PEL *) IM_REGION_ADDR( in, ix - 1, iy - 1 ); + + /* Pel size and line size. + */ + const int channels = in->im->Bands; + const int pixels_per_buffer_row = + IM_REGION_LSKIP( in ) / (sizeof( float ) * channels); + + /* Where we write the result. + */ + PEL *q = (PEL *) IM_REGION_ADDR( out, out_x, out_y ); + int z; + + for( z = 0; z < channels; z++ ) + catrom_yafr_test ((float *) q + z, (float *) p + z, + channels, pixels_per_buffer_row, + yafr_test->sharpening, + cardinal_one, + cardinal_two, + cardinal_thr, + cardinal_fou, + cardinal_uno, + cardinal_dos, + cardinal_tre, + cardinal_qua, + left_width_times_up__height_times_rite_width, + left_width_times_dow_height_times_rite_width, + left_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height, + rite_width_times_up__height_times_dow_height); +} + +static void +vips_interpolate_yafr_test_class_init( VipsInterpolateYafrTestClass *class ) +{ + VipsInterpolateClass *interpolate_class = + VIPS_INTERPOLATE_CLASS( class ); + + vips_interpolate_yafr_test_parent_class = + g_type_class_peek_parent( class ); + + interpolate_class->interpolate = vips_interpolate_yafr_test_interpolate; + interpolate_class->window_size = 4; +} + +static void +vips_interpolate_yafr_test_init( VipsInterpolateYafrTest *yafr_test ) +{ +#ifdef DEBUG + printf( "vips_interpolate_yafr_test_init: " ); + vips_object_print( VIPS_OBJECT( yafr_test ) ); +#endif /*DEBUG*/ + + yafr_test->sharpening = 1.0; +} + +GType +vips_interpolate_yafr_test_get_type( void ) +{ + static GType type = 0; + + if( !type ) { + static const GTypeInfo info = { + sizeof( VipsInterpolateYafrTestClass ), + NULL, /* base_init */ + NULL, /* base_finalize */ + (GClassInitFunc) vips_interpolate_yafr_test_class_init, + NULL, /* class_finalize */ + NULL, /* class_data */ + sizeof( VipsInterpolateYafrTest ), + 32, /* n_preallocs */ + (GInstanceInitFunc) vips_interpolate_yafr_test_init, + }; + + type = g_type_register_static( VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE, + "VipsInterpolateYafrTest", &info, 0 ); + } + + return( type ); +} + +VipsInterpolate * +vips_interpolate_yafr_test_new( void ) +{ + return( VIPS_INTERPOLATE( g_object_new( + VIPS_TYPE_INTERPOLATE_YAFR_TEST, NULL ) ) ); +} + +void +vips_interpolate_yafr_test_set_sharpening( VipsInterpolateYafrTest *yafr_test, + double sharpening ) +{ + yafr_test->sharpening = sharpening; +} + +/* Convenience: return a static yafr_test you don't need to free. + */ +VipsInterpolate * +vips_interpolate_yafr_test_static( void ) +{ + static VipsInterpolate *interpolate = NULL; + + if( !interpolate ) + interpolate = vips_interpolate_yafr_test_new(); + + return( interpolate ); +} + +