don't warn for missing exif res
don't warn for missing exif res (even though it should be there) since we fall back to jfif cs3 seems to avoid the exif res fields and just uses jfif see https://github.com/lovell/sharp/issues/657
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7a6ea3d0c
commit
3a48ff9cc1
@ -79,6 +79,8 @@
|
||||
* 07/09/16
|
||||
* - Don't use the exif resolution if x_resolution / y_resolution /
|
||||
* resolution_unit is missing
|
||||
* 4/1/17
|
||||
* - Don't warn for missing exif res, since we fall back to jfif now
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -574,11 +576,12 @@ res_from_exif( VipsImage *im, ExifData *ed )
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if( get_entry_double( ed, 0, EXIF_TAG_X_RESOLUTION, &xres ) ||
|
||||
get_entry_double( ed, 0, EXIF_TAG_Y_RESOLUTION, &yres ) ||
|
||||
get_entry_int( ed, 0, EXIF_TAG_RESOLUTION_UNIT, &unit ) ) {
|
||||
vips_warn( "VipsJpeg",
|
||||
"%s", _( "error reading resolution" ) );
|
||||
get_entry_int( ed, 0, EXIF_TAG_RESOLUTION_UNIT, &unit ) )
|
||||
/* Don't warn. There should be resolution info in the exif
|
||||
* (according to the spec), but many images skip this and rely
|
||||
* on silent fallback to the jfif resolution.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return( -1 );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef DEBUG
|
||||
printf( "res_from_exif: seen exif tags "
|
||||
|
@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ write_tag( ExifData *ed, int ifd, ExifTag tag, write_fn fn, void *data )
|
||||
/* This is different, we set the xres/yres from the vips header rather than
|
||||
* from the exif tags on the image metadata.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is also called from the jpg reader to fix up bad exif resoltion.
|
||||
* This is also called from the jpg reader to fix up bad exif resolution.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int
|
||||
vips__set_exif_resolution( ExifData *ed, VipsImage *im )
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user