sync
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c74266017
commit
5cd0b89981
43
TODO
43
TODO
@ -1,16 +1,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
- bandalike: consider RGB + RGBA ... we should bandup by adding a black band
|
||||
|
||||
(or white?? unclear)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- note member free stuff in vipsobject docs
|
||||
|
||||
should boxed get freed in finalise rather than dispose?
|
||||
|
||||
- vipsimage should be cached too, eg.
|
||||
|
||||
VipsImage *a = vips_image_new_from_file( "poop.jpg" );
|
||||
@ -20,6 +12,8 @@
|
||||
- we should cache on "written" ... we should emit written for all objects, and
|
||||
there should be a a vipsarg flag to block updates after written
|
||||
|
||||
- we have a "written" method/signal in image.h, move this to object.h
|
||||
|
||||
- the lifetime of an object is
|
||||
|
||||
new
|
||||
@ -56,21 +50,19 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- bandalike: consider RGB + RGBA ... we should bandup by adding a black band
|
||||
|
||||
(or white?? unclear)
|
||||
|
||||
not clear if this is a good idea ... eg. when we upband a 1 band to a 2
|
||||
band, should we duplicate the 1 band or add black?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- lintra_vec next ... how should we do vips_lin() vs. vips_lin_vec()? do we
|
||||
need two separate things?
|
||||
|
||||
perhaps just have vips_lin() as a convenience function
|
||||
|
||||
how about a "squash" param to VipsLin which clips the output type back to
|
||||
the input type? maybe not a great idea
|
||||
|
||||
- all things that use sizealike could take a --background param? or an
|
||||
--extend param? maybe not a great idea (maybe handy for convolve affine etc.
|
||||
though)
|
||||
- note member free stuff in vipsobject docs
|
||||
|
||||
should boxed get freed in finalise rather than dispose?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -91,21 +83,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- change the way we wrap vips7 operations
|
||||
|
||||
make im_max() appear in vips8 as "im_max" (we wrap as "max" right now), this
|
||||
will help compatibility when we redo as a class and create "max"
|
||||
|
||||
make vips.c try the vip8 APIs for an operation before falling back to vips7
|
||||
|
||||
... actually, leave it alone, it can never work well, no point encouraging
|
||||
its use
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- we have some serious exif problems
|
||||
|
||||
we attach exif as both the original exif data and as a set of broken-out
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user