clear up tiny docs issue

not about SEQ behaviour
This commit is contained in:
John Cupitt 2016-01-22 15:02:18 +00:00
parent c7eb88b87f
commit 923fb43ae9

View File

@ -176,13 +176,23 @@
* Flags we associate with an operation.
*
* @VIPS_OPERATION_SEQUENTIAL means that the operation works like vips_conv():
* it can happily process images top-to-bottom with only small non-local
* references.
* it can process images top-to-bottom with only small non-local
* references.
*
* Every scan-line must be requested, you are not allowed to skip
* ahead, but as a special case, the very first request can be for a region
* not at the top of the image. In this case, the first part of the image will
* be read and discarded
*
* @VIPS_OPERATION_SEQUENTIAL_UNBUFFERED means that the operation works like
* vips_copy(): it can happily process images top-to-bottom and makes no
* vips_copy(): it can process images top-to-bottom and makes no
* non-local references.
*
* Every scan-line must be requested, you are not allowed to skip
* ahead, but as a special case, the very first request can be for a region
* not at the top of the image. In this case, the first part of the image will
* be read and discarded
*
* @VIPS_OPERATION_NOCACHE means that the operation must not be cached by
* vips.
*