smarter cache sizing for vips_resize

see comment in code, should now account for max delay possible
This commit is contained in:
John Cupitt 2015-11-11 10:23:50 +00:00
parent 66fe338d36
commit d94a2807c9
4 changed files with 25 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
- add memory.h to Python API .. makes tracked highwater visible
- added bandjoin_const to add constant bands to an image
- better alpha handling for tiff write, thanks sadaqatullahn
- better cache sizing for vips_resize()
7/5/15 started 8.1.1
- oop, vips-8.0 wrapper script should be vips-8.1, thanks Danilo

2
TODO
View File

@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
trying new shrinker
also try resize change
- colour needs to split _build() into preprocess / process / postprocess
phases

View File

@ -621,7 +621,8 @@ write_tiff_header( Write *write, Layer *layer )
}
}
alpha_bands = write->im->Bands - colour_bands;
alpha_bands = VIPS_CLIP( 0,
write->im->Bands - colour_bands, MAX_ALPHA );
if( alpha_bands > 0 ) {
uint16 v[MAX_ALPHA];
int i;

View File

@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
* - from affine.c
* 18/11/14
* - add the fancier algorithm from vipsthumbnail
* 11/11/15
* - smarter cache sizing
*/
/*
@ -137,30 +139,44 @@ vips_resize_build( VipsObject *object )
* sequentiality.
*
* So ... read into a cache where tiles are scanlines, and make sure
* we keep enough scanlines to be able to serve a line of tiles.
* we keep enough scanlines.
*
* We use a threaded tilecache to avoid a deadlock: suppose thread1,
* evaluating the top block of the output, is delayed, and thread2,
* evaluating the second block, gets here first (this can happen on
* a heavily-loaded system).
*
* With an unthreaded tilecache (as we had before), thread2 will get
* With an unthreaded tilecache, thread2 will get
* the cache lock and start evaling the second block of the shrink.
* When it reaches the png reader it will stall until the first block
* has been used ... but it never will, since thread1 will block on
* this cache lock.
*
* Cache sizing: we double-buffer writes, so threads can be up to one
* line of tiles behind. For example, one thread could be allocated
* tile (0,0) and then stall, the whole write system won't stall until
* it tries to allocate tile (0, 2).
*
* We affine down after this, which can be a scale of up to @residual,
* perhaps 0.5 or down as low as 0.3 depending on the interpolator. So
* the number of scanlines we need to keep for the worst case is
* 2 * @tile_height / @residual, plus a little extra.
*
*/
if( int_shrink > 1 ) {
int tile_width;
int tile_height;
int nlines;
int need_lines;
vips_get_tile_size( in,
&tile_width, &tile_height, &nlines );
need_lines = 2.5 * tile_height / residual;
if( vips_tilecache( in, &t[6],
"tile_width", in->Xsize,
"tile_height", 10,
"max_tiles", 1 + (nlines * 2) / 10,
"max_tiles", 1 + need_lines / 10,
"access", VIPS_ACCESS_SEQUENTIAL,
"threaded", TRUE,
NULL ) )