2023-10-25 15:21:20 +02:00
|
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
SMARTFS
|
|
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-27 16:53:12 +02:00
|
|
|
This page contains information about the implementation of the NuttX
|
2023-10-25 15:21:20 +02:00
|
|
|
Sector Mapped Allocation for Really Tiny (SMART) FLASH file system, SMARTFS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Features
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This implementation is a full-feature file system from the perspective of
|
|
|
|
file and directory access (i.e. not considering low-level details like the
|
|
|
|
lack of bad block management). The SMART File System was designed specifically
|
|
|
|
for small SPI based FLASH parts (1-8 Mbyte for example), though this is not
|
|
|
|
a limitation. It can certainly be used for any size FLASH and can work with
|
|
|
|
any MTD device by binding it with the SMART MTD layer and has been tested with
|
|
|
|
devices as large as 128MByte (using a 2048 byte sector size with 65534 sectors).
|
|
|
|
The FS includes support for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Multiple open files from different threads.
|
|
|
|
- Open for read/write access with seek capability.
|
|
|
|
- Appending to end of files in either write, append or read/write open modes.
|
|
|
|
- Directory support.
|
|
|
|
- Support for multiple mount points on a single volume / partition (see details
|
|
|
|
below).
|
|
|
|
- Selectable FLASH Wear leveling algorithym
|
|
|
|
- Selectable CRC-8 or CRC-16 error detection for sector data
|
|
|
|
- Reduced RAM model for FLASH geometries with large number of sectors (16K-64K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General operation
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SMART File System divides the FLASH device or partition into equal
|
|
|
|
sized sectors which are allocated and "released" as needed to perform file
|
|
|
|
read/write and directory management operations. Sectors are then "chained"
|
|
|
|
together to build files and directories. The operations are split into two
|
|
|
|
layers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The MTD block layer (nuttx/drivers/mtd/smart.c). This layer manages
|
|
|
|
all low-level FLASH access operations including sector allocations,
|
|
|
|
logical to physical sector mapping, erase operations, etc.
|
|
|
|
2. The FS layer (nuttx/fs/smart/smartfs_smart.c). This layer manages
|
|
|
|
high-level file and directory creation, read/write, deletion, sector
|
|
|
|
chaining, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMART MTD Block layer
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SMART MTD block layer divides the erase blocks of the FLASH device into
|
|
|
|
"sectors". Sectors have both physical and logical number assignments.
|
|
|
|
The physicl sector number represents the actual offset from the beginning
|
|
|
|
of the device, while the logical sector number is assigned as needed.
|
|
|
|
A physical sector can have any logical sector assignment, and as files
|
|
|
|
are created, modified and destroyed, the logical sector number assignment
|
|
|
|
for a given physical sector will change over time. The logical sector
|
|
|
|
number is saved in the physical sector header as the first 2 bytes, and
|
|
|
|
the MTD layer maintains an in-memory map of the logical to physical mapping.
|
|
|
|
Only physical sectors that are in use will have a logical assignment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also contained in the sector header is a flags byte and a sequence number.
|
|
|
|
When a sector is allocated, the COMMITTED flag will be "set" (changed from
|
|
|
|
erase state to non-erase state) to indicate the sector data is valid. When
|
|
|
|
a sector's data needs to be deleted, the RELEASED flag will be "set" to
|
|
|
|
indicate the sector is no longer in use. This is done because the erase
|
|
|
|
block containing the sector cannot necessarily be erased until all sectors
|
|
|
|
in that block have been "released". This allows sectors in the erase
|
|
|
|
block to remain active while others are inactive until a "garbage collection"
|
|
|
|
operation is needed on the volume to reclaim released sectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sequence number is used when a logical sector's data needs to be
|
|
|
|
updated with new information. When this happens, a new physical sector
|
|
|
|
will be allocated which has a duplicate logical sector number but a
|
|
|
|
higher sequence number. This allows maintaining flash consistency in the
|
|
|
|
event of a power failure by writing new data prior to releasing the old.
|
|
|
|
In the event of a power failure causing duplicate logical sector numbers,
|
|
|
|
the sector with the higher sequence number will win, and the older logical
|
|
|
|
sector will be released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SMART MTD block layer reserves some logical sector numbers for internal
|
|
|
|
use, including::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector 0: The Format Sector. Has a format signature, format version, etc.
|
|
|
|
Also contains wear leveling information if enabled.
|
|
|
|
Sector 1-2: Additional wear-leveling info storage if needed.
|
|
|
|
Sector 3: The 1st (or only) Root Directory entry
|
|
|
|
Sector 4-10: Additional root directories when Multi-Mount points are supported.
|
|
|
|
Sector 11-12: Reserved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To perform allocations, the SMART MTD block layer searches each erase block
|
|
|
|
on the device to identify the one with the most free sectors. Free sectors
|
|
|
|
are those that have all bytes in the "erased state", meaning they have not
|
|
|
|
been previously allocated/released since the last block erase. Not all
|
|
|
|
sectors on the device can be allocated ... the SMART MTD block driver must
|
|
|
|
reserve at least one erase-block worth of unused sectors to perform
|
|
|
|
garbage collection, which will be performed automatically when no free
|
|
|
|
sectors are available. When wear leveling is enabled, the allocator also takes
|
|
|
|
into account the erase block erasure status to maintain level wearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garbage collection is performed by identifying the erase block with the most
|
|
|
|
"released" sectors (those that were previously allocated but no longer being
|
|
|
|
used) and moving all still-active sectors to a different erase block. Then
|
|
|
|
the now "vacant" erase block is erased, thus changing a group of released
|
|
|
|
sectors into free sectors. This may occur several times depending on the
|
|
|
|
number of released sectors on the volume such that better "wear leveling"
|
|
|
|
is achieved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard MTD block layer functions are provided for block read, block write,
|
|
|
|
etc. so that system utilities such as the "dd" command can be used,
|
|
|
|
however, all SMART operations are performed using SMART specific ioctl
|
|
|
|
codes to perform sector allocate, sector release, sector write, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of config items that the SMART MTD layer can take advantage of
|
|
|
|
in the underlying MTD drivers is SUBSECTOR_ERASE and BYTE_WRITE. Most
|
|
|
|
flash devices have a 32K to 128K Erase block size, but some of them
|
|
|
|
have a smaller erase size available also. Vendors have different names
|
|
|
|
for the smaller erase size; In the NuttX MTD layer it is called
|
|
|
|
SUBSECTOR_ERASE. For FLASH devices that support the smaller erase size,
|
|
|
|
this configuration item can be added to the underlying MTD driver, and
|
2023-10-27 16:53:12 +02:00
|
|
|
SMART will use it. As of the writing of this page, only the
|
2023-10-25 15:21:20 +02:00
|
|
|
drivers/mtd/m25px.c driver had support for SUBSECTOR_ERASE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The BYTE_WRITE config option enables use of the underlying MTD driver's
|
|
|
|
ability to write data a byte or a few bytes at a time vs. a full page
|
|
|
|
at at time (which is typically 256 bytes). For FLASH devices that support
|
|
|
|
byte write mode, support for this config item can be added to the MTD
|
|
|
|
driver. Enabling and supporting this feature reduces the traffic on the
|
|
|
|
SPI bus considerably because SMARTFS performs many operations that affect
|
|
|
|
only a few bytes on the device. Without BYTE_WRITE, the code must
|
|
|
|
perform a full page read-modify-write operation on a 256 or even 512
|
|
|
|
byte page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wear Leveling
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When wear leveling is enabled, the code automatically writes data across
|
|
|
|
the entire FLASH device in a manner that causes each erase block to be
|
|
|
|
worn (i.e. erased) evenly. This is accomplished by maintaining a 4-bit
|
|
|
|
wear level count for each erase block and forcing less worn blocks to be
|
|
|
|
used for writing new data. The code maintains each block's erase count
|
|
|
|
to be within 16 erases of each other, though through testing, the span
|
|
|
|
so far was never greater than 10 erases of each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the data in a block is modified repeatedly, the erase count will
|
|
|
|
increase. When the wear level reaches a value of 8 or higher, and the block
|
|
|
|
needs to be erased (because the data in it has been modified, etc.) the code
|
|
|
|
will select an erase block with the lowest wear count and relocate it to
|
|
|
|
this block (with the higher wear count). The idea being that a block with
|
|
|
|
the lowest wear count contains more "static" data and should require fewer
|
|
|
|
additional erase operations. This relocation process will continue on the
|
|
|
|
block (only when it needs to be erased again).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the wear level of all erase blocks has increased to a level of
|
|
|
|
SMART_WEAR_MIN_LEVEL (currently set to 5), then the wear level counts
|
|
|
|
will all be reduced by this value. This keeps the wear counts normalized
|
|
|
|
so they fit in a 4-bit value. Note that theoretically, it *IS* possible to
|
|
|
|
write data to the flash in a manner that causes the wear count of a single
|
|
|
|
erase block to increment beyond it's maximum value of 15. This would have
|
|
|
|
to be a very, very, very specific and un-predictable write sequence though
|
|
|
|
as data is always spread out across the sectors and relocated dynamically.
|
|
|
|
In the extremely rare event this does occur, the code will automatically
|
|
|
|
cap the maximum wear level at 15 an increment an "uneven wear count"
|
|
|
|
variable to indicate the number times this event has occurred. So far, I
|
|
|
|
have not been able to get the wear count above 10 though my testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The wear level status bits are saved in the format sector (logical sector
|
|
|
|
number zero) with overflow saved in the reserved logical sectors one and
|
|
|
|
two. Additionally, the uneven wear count (and total block erases if
|
|
|
|
PROCFS is enabled) are stored in the format sector. When the PROCFS file
|
|
|
|
system is enabled and a SMARTFS volume is mounted, the SMART block driver
|
|
|
|
details and / or wear level details can be viewed with a command such as::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cat /proc/fs/smartfs/smart0/status
|
|
|
|
Format version: 1
|
|
|
|
Name Len: 16
|
|
|
|
Total Sectors: 2048
|
|
|
|
Sector Size: 512
|
|
|
|
Format Sector: 1487
|
|
|
|
Dir Sector: 8
|
|
|
|
Free Sectors: 67
|
|
|
|
Released Sectors: 572
|
|
|
|
Unused Sectors: 817
|
|
|
|
Block Erases: 5680
|
|
|
|
Sectors Per Block: 8
|
|
|
|
Sector Utilization:98%
|
|
|
|
Uneven Wear Count: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cat /proc/fs/smartfs/smart0/erasemap
|
|
|
|
DDDCGCCDDCDCCDCBDCCDDGBBDBCDCCDDDCDDDDCCDDCCCGCGDCCDBCDDGBDBDCDD
|
|
|
|
BCCCDDCCDDDCBCCDGCCCBDDCCGBBCBCCGDCCDCBDBCCCDCDDCDDGCDCGDCBCDBDG
|
|
|
|
BCDDCDCBGCCCDDCGBCCGBCCBDDBDDCGDCDDDCGCDDBCDCBDDBCDCGDDCCBCGBCCC
|
|
|
|
GCBCCGCCCDDDBGCCCCGDCCCCCDCDDGBBDACABDBBABCAABCCCDAACBADADDDAECB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enabling wear leveling can increase the total number of block erases on the
|
|
|
|
device in favor of even wearing (erasing). This is caused by writing /
|
|
|
|
moving sectors that otherwise don't need to be written to move static data
|
|
|
|
to the more highly worn blocks. This additional write requirement is known
|
|
|
|
as write amplification. To get an idea of the amount of write amplification
|
|
|
|
incurred by enabling wear leveling, I conducted the smart_test example using
|
|
|
|
four different configurations (wear, no wear, CRC-8, no CRC) and the results
|
|
|
|
are shown below. This was done on a 1M Byte simulated FLASH with 4K erase
|
|
|
|
block size, 512 sectors per byte. The smart_test creates a 700K file and
|
|
|
|
then performs 20,000 random seek, write, verify tests. The seek write forces
|
|
|
|
a multitude of sector relocation operations (with or without CRC enabled),
|
|
|
|
causing a boatload of block erases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enabling wear leveling actually decreased the number of erase operations
|
|
|
|
with CRC enabled or disabled. This is only a single test point based one
|
|
|
|
testing method ... results will likely vary based on the method the data
|
|
|
|
is written, the amount of static vs. dynamic data, the amount of free space
|
|
|
|
on the volume, and the volume geometry (erase block size, sector size, etc.).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of the tests are::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case Total Block erases
|
|
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
No wear leveling CRC-8 6632
|
|
|
|
Wear leveling CRC-8 5585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No wear leveling no CRC 6658
|
|
|
|
Wear leveling no CRC 5398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced RAM model
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On devices with a larger number of logical sectors (i.e. a lot of erase
|
|
|
|
blocks with a small selected sector size), the RAM requirement can become
|
|
|
|
fairly significant. This is caused by the in-memory sector map which
|
|
|
|
keeps track of the logical to physical mapping of all sectors. This is
|
|
|
|
a RAM array which is 2 * totalsectors in size. For a device with 64K
|
|
|
|
sectors, this means 128K of RAM is required just for the sector map, not
|
|
|
|
counting RAM for read/write buffers, erase block management, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So a reduced RAM model has been added which only keeps track of which
|
|
|
|
logical sectors have been used (a table which is totalsectors / 8 in size)
|
|
|
|
and a configurable sized sector map cache. Each entry in the sector map
|
|
|
|
cache is 6 bytes (logical sector, physical sector and cache entry age).
|
|
|
|
ON DEVICES WITH SMALLER TOTAL SECTOR COUNT, ENABLING THIS OPTION COULD
|
|
|
|
ACTUALLY INCREASE THE RAM FOOTPRINT INSTEAD OF REDUCE IT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sector map cache size should be selected to balance the desired RAM
|
|
|
|
usage and the file system performance. When a logical to physical sector
|
|
|
|
mapping is not found in the cache, the code must perform a physical search
|
|
|
|
of the FLASH to find the requested logical sector. This involves reading
|
|
|
|
the 5-byte header from each sector on the device until the sector is
|
|
|
|
found. Performing a full read, seek or open for append on a large file
|
|
|
|
can cause the sector map cache to flush completely if the file is larger
|
|
|
|
than (cache entries * sector size). For example, in a configuration with
|
|
|
|
256 cache entries and a 512 byte sector size, a full read, seek or open for
|
|
|
|
append on a 128K file will flush the cache.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An additional RAM savings is realized on FLASH parts that contain 16 or
|
|
|
|
fewer logical sectors per erase block by packing the free and released
|
|
|
|
sector counts into a single byte (plus a little extra for 16 sectors per
|
|
|
|
erase block). A device with a 64K erase block size can benefit from this
|
|
|
|
savings by selecting a 4096 or 8192 byte logical sector size, for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMART FS Layer
|
|
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This layer interfaces with the SMART MTD block layer to allocate / release
|
|
|
|
logical sectors, create and destroy sector chains, and perform directory and
|
|
|
|
file I/O operations. Each directory and file on the volume is represented
|
|
|
|
as a chain or "linked list" of logical sectors. Thus the actual physical
|
|
|
|
sectors that a give file or directory uses does not need to be contiguous
|
|
|
|
and in fact can (and will) move around over time. To manage the sector
|
|
|
|
chains, the SMARTFS layer adds a "chain header" after the sector's "sector
|
|
|
|
header". This is a 5-byte header which contains the chain type (file or
|
|
|
|
directory), a "next logical sector" entry and the count of bytes actually
|
|
|
|
used within the sector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Files are stored in directories, which are sector chains that have a
|
|
|
|
specific data format to track file names and "first" logical sector
|
|
|
|
numbers. Each file in the directory has a fixed-size "directory entry"
|
|
|
|
that has bits to indicate if it is still active or has been deleted, file
|
|
|
|
permission bits, first sector number, date (utc stamp), and filename. The
|
|
|
|
filename length is set from the CONFIG_SMARTFS_NAMLEN config value at the
|
|
|
|
time the mksmartfs command is executed. Changes to the
|
|
|
|
CONFIG_SMARTFS_NAMLEN parameter will not be reflected on the volume
|
|
|
|
unless it is reformatted. The same is true of the sector size parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subdirectories are supported by creating a new sector chain (of type
|
|
|
|
directory) and creating a standard directory entry for it in it's parent
|
|
|
|
directory. Then files and additional sub-directories can be added to
|
|
|
|
that directory chain. As such, each directory on the volume will occupy
|
|
|
|
a minimum of one sector on the device. Subdirectories can be deleted
|
|
|
|
only if they are "empty" (i.e they reference no active entries). There
|
|
|
|
are no provision made for performing a recursive directory delete.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New files and subdirectories can be added to a directory without needing
|
|
|
|
to copy and release the original directory sector. This is done by
|
|
|
|
writing only the new entry data to the sector and ignoring the "bytes
|
|
|
|
used" field of the chain header for directories. Updates (modifying
|
|
|
|
existing data) or appending to a sector for regular files requires copying
|
|
|
|
the file data to a new sector and releasing the old one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMARTFS organization
|
|
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following example assumes 2 logical blocks per FLASH erase block. The
|
|
|
|
actual relationship is determined by the FLASH geometry reported by the MTD
|
|
|
|
driver::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ERASE LOGICAL Sectors begin with a sector header. Sectors may
|
|
|
|
BLOCK SECTOR CONTENTS be marked as "released," pending garbage collection
|
|
|
|
n 2*n --+---------------+
|
|
|
|
Sector Hdr |LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL| Logical sector number (2 bytes)
|
|
|
|
|QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ| Sequence number (2 bytes)
|
|
|
|
|SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS| Status bits (1 byte)
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
FS Hdr |TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT| Sector Type (dir or file) (1 byte)
|
|
|
|
|NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN| Number of next logical sector in chain
|
|
|
|
|UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| Number of bytes used in this sector
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| (Sector Data) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2*n+1 --+---------------+
|
|
|
|
Sector Hdr |LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL| Logical sector number (2 bytes)
|
|
|
|
|QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ| Sequence number (2 bytes)
|
|
|
|
|SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS| Status bits (1 byte)
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
FS Hdr |TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT| Sector Type (dir or file) (1 byte)
|
|
|
|
|NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN| Number of next logical sector in chain
|
|
|
|
|UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| Number of bytes used in this sector
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| (Sector Data) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
n+1 2*(n+1) --+---------------+
|
|
|
|
Sector Hdr |LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL| Logical sector number (2 bytes)
|
|
|
|
|QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ| Sequence number (2 bytes)
|
|
|
|
|SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS| Status bits (1 byte)
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
FS Hdr |TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT| Sector Type (dir or file) (1 byte)
|
|
|
|
|NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN| Number of next logical sector in chain
|
|
|
|
|UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| Number of bytes used in this sector
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| (Sector Data) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
--+---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
|
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
``SECTOR HEADER``
|
|
|
|
Each sector contains a header (currently 5 bytes) for identifying the
|
|
|
|
status of the sector. The header contains the sector's logical sector
|
|
|
|
number mapping, an incrementing sequence number to manage changes to
|
|
|
|
logical sector data, and sector flags (committed, released, version, etc.).
|
|
|
|
At the block level, there is no notion of sector chaining, only
|
|
|
|
allocated sectors within erase blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``FORMAT HEADER``
|
|
|
|
Contains information regarding the format on the volume, including
|
|
|
|
a format signature, formatted block size, name length within the directory
|
|
|
|
chains, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``CHAIN HEADER``
|
|
|
|
The file system header (next 5 bytes) tracks file and directory sector
|
|
|
|
chains and actual sector usage (number of bytes that are valid in the
|
|
|
|
sector). Also indicates the type of chain (file or directory).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Mount Points
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typically, a volume contains a single root directory entry (logical sector
|
|
|
|
number 1) and all files and subdirectories are "children" of that root
|
|
|
|
directory. This is a traditional scheme and allows the volume to
|
|
|
|
be mounted in a single location within the VFS. As a configuration
|
|
|
|
option, when the volume is formatted via the mksmartfs command, multiple
|
|
|
|
root directory entries can be created instead. The number of entries to
|
|
|
|
be created is an added parameter to the mksmartfs command in this
|
|
|
|
configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When this option has been enabled in the configuration and specified
|
|
|
|
during the format, then the volume will have multiple root directories
|
|
|
|
and can support a mount point in the VFS for each. In this mode,
|
|
|
|
the device entries reported in the /dev directory will have a directory
|
|
|
|
number postfixed to the name, such as::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/dev/smart0d1
|
|
|
|
/dev/smart0d2
|
|
|
|
/dev/smart1p1d1
|
|
|
|
/dev/smart1p2d2
|
|
|
|
etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each device entry can then be mounted at different locations, such as::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/dev/smart0d1 --> /usr
|
|
|
|
/dev/smart0d2 --> /home
|
|
|
|
etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using multiple mount points is slightly different from using partitions
|
|
|
|
on the volume in that each mount point has the potential to use the
|
|
|
|
entire space on the volume vs. having a pre-allocated reservation of
|
|
|
|
space defined by the partition sizes. Also, all files and directories
|
|
|
|
of all mount-points will be physically "mixed in" with data from the
|
|
|
|
other mount-points (though files from one will never logically "appear"
|
|
|
|
in the others). Each directory structure is isolated from the others,
|
|
|
|
they simply share the same physical media for storage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMARTFS Limitations
|
|
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This implementation has several limitations that you should be aware
|
|
|
|
before opting to use SMARTFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. There is currently no FLASH bad-block management code. The reason for
|
|
|
|
this is that the FS was geared for Serial NOR FLASH parts. To use
|
|
|
|
SMARTFS with a NAND FLASH, bad block management would need to be added,
|
|
|
|
along with a few minor changes to eliminate single bit writes to release
|
|
|
|
a sector, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. The implementation can support CRC-8 or CRC-16 error detection, and can
|
|
|
|
relocate a failed write operation to a new sector. However with no bad
|
|
|
|
block management implementation, the code will continue it attempts at
|
|
|
|
using failing block / sector, reducing efficiency and possibly successfully
|
|
|
|
saving data in a block with questionable integrity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. The released-sector garbage collection process occurs only during a write
|
|
|
|
when there are no free FLASH sectors. Thus, occasionally, file writing
|
|
|
|
may take a long time. This typically isn't noticeable unless the volume
|
|
|
|
is very full and multiple copy / erase cycles must be performed to
|
|
|
|
complete the garbage collection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. The total number of logical sectors on the device must be 65534 or less.
|
|
|
|
The number of logical sectors is based on the total device / partition
|
|
|
|
size and the selected sector size. For larger flash parts, a larger
|
|
|
|
sector size would need to be used to meet this requirement. Creating a
|
|
|
|
geometry which results in 65536 sectors (a 32MByte FLASH with 512 byte
|
|
|
|
logical sector, for example) will cause the code to automatically reduce
|
|
|
|
the total sector count to 65534, thus "wasting" the last two logical
|
|
|
|
sectors on the device (they will never be used).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This restriction exists because:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. The logical sector number is a 16-bit field (i.e. 65535 is the max).
|
|
|
|
b. Logical sector number 65535 (0xFFFF) is reserved as this is typically
|
|
|
|
the "erased state" of the FLASH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ioctls
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``BIOC_LLFORMAT``
|
|
|
|
Performs a SMART low-level format on the volume. This erases the volume
|
|
|
|
and writes the FORMAT HEADER to the first physical sector on the volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``BIOC_GETFORMAT``
|
|
|
|
Returns information about the format found on the volume during the
|
|
|
|
"scan" operation which is performed when the volume is mounted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``BIOC_ALLOCSECT``
|
|
|
|
Allocates a logical sector on the device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``BIOC_FREESECT``
|
|
|
|
Frees a logical sector that had been previously allocated. This
|
|
|
|
causes the sector to be marked as "released" and possibly causes the
|
|
|
|
erase block to be erased if it is the last active sector in the
|
|
|
|
it's erase block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``BIOC_READSECT``
|
|
|
|
Reads data from a logical sector. This uses a structure to identify
|
|
|
|
the offset and count of data to be read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``BIOC_WRITESECT``
|
|
|
|
Writes data to a logical sector. This uses a structure to identify
|
|
|
|
the offset and count of data to be written. May cause a logical
|
|
|
|
sector to be physically relocated and may cause garbage collection
|
|
|
|
if needed when moving data to a new physical sector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Things to Do
|
|
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Add file permission checking to open / read / write routines.
|
|
|
|
- Add reporting of actual FLASH usage for directories (each directory
|
|
|
|
occupies one or more physical sectors, yet the size is reported as
|
|
|
|
zero for directories).
|