497 lines
23 KiB
ReStructuredText
497 lines
23 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. warning:: this list is incomplete. See drivers/sensors for ar full list of
|
|||
|
supported sensors
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
==============
|
|||
|
Sensor Drivers
|
|||
|
==============
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ADXL345
|
|||
|
=======
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contributed by Alan Carvalho de Assis
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The ADXL345 accelerometer can operate in I2C or SPI mode. To operate in I2C
|
|||
|
mode just connect the CS pin to Vddi/o.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In order to operate in SPI mode CS need to use connected to microcontroller,
|
|||
|
it cannot leave unconnected.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In SPI mode it works with clock polarity (CPOL) = 1 and clock phase (CPHA)
|
|||
|
= 1.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ADXL372
|
|||
|
=======
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contributed by Bob Feretich
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The ADXL372 is a 200g tri-axis accelerometer that is capable of detecting
|
|||
|
and recording shock impact impact events. Recording trigger
|
|||
|
characteristics are programmed into the sensor via multiple threshold and
|
|||
|
duration registers. The ADXL372 is a SPI only device that can transfer
|
|||
|
data at 10 MHz. The data transfer performance of this part permits the
|
|||
|
sensor to be sampled "on demand" rather than periodically sampled by a
|
|||
|
worker task.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
See the description of the "Common Sensor Register Interface" below for more
|
|||
|
details. It also implements the "Sensor Cluster Driver Interface".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
LSM330_SPI
|
|||
|
==========
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contributed by Bob Feretich
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The LSM330 consists of a multi-range tri-axis accelerometer and a
|
|||
|
multi-range tri-axis gyroscope. The tri-axis accelerometer features two
|
|||
|
state machines that can be firmware programmed for event detection. The
|
|||
|
tri-axis gyroscope features threshold and duration registers for event
|
|||
|
detection.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This driver supports the LSM330 in SPI mode. In this mode, the LSM330
|
|||
|
that can transfer data at 10 MHz. The data transfer performance of
|
|||
|
this part permits the sensor to be sampled "on demand" rather than
|
|||
|
periodically sampled by a worker task. See the description of the "Common
|
|||
|
Sensor Register Interface" below for more details. It also implements the
|
|||
|
"Sensor Cluster Driver Interface".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MPL115A
|
|||
|
=======
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contributed by Alan Carvalho de Assis
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This driver has support only for MPL115A1 (SPI), but support to MPL115A2
|
|||
|
(I2C) can be added easily.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Common Sensor Register Interface
|
|||
|
================================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contributed by Bob Feretich
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Background and problem statement:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The capabilities and performance of modern sensors have grown tremendously.
|
|||
|
Most sensors are now capable of some degree of autonomous behavior and
|
|||
|
several permit the user to load firmware into them and perform as
|
|||
|
nanocontrollers. Other sensors have very sophisticated built-in digital
|
|||
|
filters that can be programmed with hundreds of parameters.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Currently most sensor drivers in the NuttX drivers/sensors
|
|||
|
directory implement file_ops open(), close(), and read() functions.
|
|||
|
The open() function initializes the sensor and places it in a mode where
|
|||
|
it can transfer live data in a default configuration. The close() function
|
|||
|
places the sensor in a low power shutdown mode. The read() function
|
|||
|
returns the most recent data sample from the sensor's most used data
|
|||
|
output registers. The write() function is rarely implemented and when it
|
|||
|
is there is no consistency in its use. The lseek() and poll() functions
|
|||
|
seem to be completely ignored. This results in the sensors being operated
|
|||
|
in only their most primitive modes using a fixed "default configuration".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To work around this problem sensor drivers have implemented ioctl()
|
|||
|
functions to perform configuration, program the sensor, and manage
|
|||
|
autonomous activity. Ioctls provide a method where user programs can
|
|||
|
tunnel through a high level driver to access and control device specific
|
|||
|
features. The problem with using ioctls is that before the ioctl interface
|
|||
|
can be used, the sensor driver must be opened; and the open() function
|
|||
|
causes the driver to start performing these primitive actions, so before
|
|||
|
ioctls can manage the drivers as desired, ioctls must first be used to
|
|||
|
undo the generic actions caused by the open() function. Another major
|
|||
|
issue is that there is no consistency from sensor to sensor on ioctl
|
|||
|
definitions, not even for the most common sensor actions like writing a
|
|||
|
sensor control register or reading a sensor status register.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Purpose:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The purpose of the "Common Sensor Register Interface" is to implement a
|
|||
|
consistent and more useful definition of file_ops interface and to make the
|
|||
|
file_ops open() function more flexible in establishing the initial
|
|||
|
operational state of the sensor. Compatibility for user applications that
|
|||
|
implement the current open(), close(), read() interface will be
|
|||
|
maintained; and the much greater capabilities of modern sensors will
|
|||
|
become accessible through this interface.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Scope:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Applicable to I2C and SPI attached sensors, and some serial port attached
|
|||
|
sensors.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The file_ops interface definition:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
open(): This function performs the below actions...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1) Reads the sensors ID register. If the sensor responds with an
|
|||
|
unexpected value, then...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a) The driver's write() function is disabled.
|
|||
|
b) The open function initializes the driver instance, so
|
|||
|
that read() and lseek() operations may be performed to enable
|
|||
|
problem diagnoses, but the sensor hardware is not initialized.
|
|||
|
(No write operations are performed to the sensor.)
|
|||
|
c) The errno global variable is set to positive ENODEV
|
|||
|
("No such device").
|
|||
|
d) The open() function returns successfully with a file_handle.
|
|||
|
Note that the calling routine should clear errno before
|
|||
|
calling open(). (The file_ops rules prevent drivers from
|
|||
|
setting errno to zero.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2) The other file_ops functions are enabled.
|
|||
|
3) The driver's "current reg address" state variable is set to the
|
|||
|
sensor's first sensor data output register. (This will make
|
|||
|
calls to read() return live sensor data and maintain compatibility
|
|||
|
with existing user programs.)
|
|||
|
4) If the driver supports a default worker task and an interrupt
|
|||
|
handler is specified by in the sensor configuration structure, then
|
|||
|
the default worker task is bound to the default worker task.
|
|||
|
5) The sensor configuration structure (that was provided to the driver
|
|||
|
registration function) is examined to determine whether a custom
|
|||
|
sensor configuration is specified. (The custom configuration is
|
|||
|
basically an array of (device_reg_address, value) pairs that are
|
|||
|
written to the sensor via "single register write" operations.
|
|||
|
If a custom sensor configuration was specified, then that
|
|||
|
configuration is written to the sensor, otherwise the "default
|
|||
|
sensor configuration" is written to the sensor.
|
|||
|
(A side effect of writing this data may result in interrupts
|
|||
|
occurring and data being transferred to/from the worker task.)
|
|||
|
6) The open() function returns successfully with a file_handle.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``close()``: This function stops sensor activity and places it in a low
|
|||
|
power mode. The file_ops interface functions are disabled for this
|
|||
|
instance of the sensor driver. (Except for open())
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``read()``: The action of this function is dependent on whether a "default
|
|||
|
worker task" is running and the value of the driver's "current reg
|
|||
|
address" state variable.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If a "default worker task" is running,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
AND the driver's "current reg address" is equal to the value of
|
|||
|
the first sensor data output register,
|
|||
|
AND the number of bytes to be read is less than or equal to the
|
|||
|
number of bytes in a "default worker task" sample,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Then data is copied from the "default worker task's" sample memory to
|
|||
|
the caller's provided buffer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Otherwise, this function transfers data from sensor registers to the
|
|||
|
data buffer provided by the caller. The first byte read is from the
|
|||
|
sensor register address specified by the sensor's "current reg
|
|||
|
address". The addresses of subsequent bytes to be read are context
|
|||
|
sensitive. If more than bus transfer is needed to complete the read,
|
|||
|
then a "multi-byte" (sometimes called "burst mode") data transfer
|
|||
|
will be used to fill the buffer.
|
|||
|
See the sensor's datasheet to determine the auto-increment
|
|||
|
behavior of a "multi-byte" data transfers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Note: That most sensors collect only a few bytes of data per sample.
|
|||
|
Small data transfers occurring over a high speed bus (like SPI and some
|
|||
|
high speed i2c and serial interfaces) are much more efficient when
|
|||
|
collected directly from the sensor hardware than by using a worker task
|
|||
|
as an intermediary.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``write()``: This function transfers data from the data buffer provided by
|
|||
|
the caller to sensor registers. The first byte written is to the
|
|||
|
sensor register address specified by the sensor's "current reg
|
|||
|
address". The addresses of subsequent bytes to be read are context
|
|||
|
sensitive. If more than bus transfer is needed to complete the write,
|
|||
|
then a "multi-byte" (sometimes called "burst mode") data
|
|||
|
transfer will be used to transfer data from the buffer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
See the sensor's datasheet to determine the auto-increment
|
|||
|
behavior of a "multi-byte" data transfers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Note: If write() function was disabled, then no writes will be performed
|
|||
|
and the function will return 0 (characters transferred) and errno
|
|||
|
is set to -EROFS ("read-only file system").
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``lseek()``: This function sets the value of the sensor's "current reg address"
|
|||
|
(seek_address). The open() function initializes the "current reg address"
|
|||
|
to the first sensor data output register, so unless the user needs
|
|||
|
to change the sensor configuration, lseek() does not need to be
|
|||
|
called. Neither read() nor write() change the sensor's "current reg
|
|||
|
address".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The definition of lseek is...::
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
off_t lseek(int fd, off_t offset, int whence);
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For whence == SEEK_SET, the sensor's "current reg address" will be set
|
|||
|
to offset.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For whence == SEEK_CUR, offset will be added to the sensor's "current
|
|||
|
reg address".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For whence == SEEK_END, offset is ignored and the sensor's "current
|
|||
|
reg address" is set to the first sensor data output register.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
lseek() will return an error if the resulting "current reg address"
|
|||
|
is invalid for the sensor.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``ioctl()``: Ioctls() may still be used and this interface make no attempt to
|
|||
|
regulate them. But, it is expected that far fewer ioctls will be needed.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The above interface can be used to fully configure a sensor to the needs
|
|||
|
of an application, including the ability to load firmware into sensor
|
|||
|
state machines
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sensor Cluster Driver Interface
|
|||
|
===============================
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contributed by Bob Feretich
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Background and problem statement:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Most microcontrollers can support SPI bus transfers at 8 MHz or greater.
|
|||
|
Most SPI attached sensors can support a 10 MHz SPI bus. Most tri-axis
|
|||
|
accelerometers, tri-axis gyroscopes, or tri-axis magnetometers use only 6
|
|||
|
bytes per sample. Many sensors use less than 6 bytes per sample. On an 8
|
|||
|
MHz SPI bus it takes about 8 microseconds to transfer a 6 byte sample.
|
|||
|
(This time includes a command byte, 6 data bytes, and chip select select
|
|||
|
setup and hold.) So, for the below discussion keep in mind that the sensor
|
|||
|
sample collection work we want to perform should ideally take 8 microseconds
|
|||
|
per sample.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The drivers in the drivers/sensors directory support only the user space
|
|||
|
file_ops interface (accessing drivers through the POSIX open/read/close
|
|||
|
functions using a file descriptor). Also these drivers typically start
|
|||
|
their own worker task to perform sensor data collection, even when their
|
|||
|
sensors only transfer a few bytes of data per sample and those transfers
|
|||
|
are being made over a high performance bus.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Using the current implementation...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1) A sensor "data ready" or timer interrupt occurs.
|
|||
|
2) Context is saved and and the driver's interrupt handler is scheduled
|
|||
|
to run.
|
|||
|
3) The NuttX scheduler dispatches the driver's interrupt handler task.
|
|||
|
4) The driver's interrupt handler task posts to a semaphore that the
|
|||
|
driver's worker task is waiting on.
|
|||
|
5) NuttX restores the context for the driver's worker task and starts it
|
|||
|
running.
|
|||
|
6) The driver's worker task starts the i/o to collect the sample.) (This is
|
|||
|
where the 8 microseconds of real work gets performed.) And waits on a
|
|||
|
SPI data transfer complete semaphore.
|
|||
|
7) The NuttX saves the context of the driver's worker task, and the
|
|||
|
scheduler dispatches some other task to run while we are waiting.
|
|||
|
Note that this is a good thing. This task is probably performing some
|
|||
|
other real work. We want this to happen during the data transfer.
|
|||
|
8) The completion of the data transfer causes an interrupt. NuttX saves the
|
|||
|
current context and restores the driver's worker task's context.
|
|||
|
9) The driver's worker task goes to sleep waiting on the semaphore for the
|
|||
|
next sensor "data ready" or timer interrupt.
|
|||
|
10) The NuttX saves the context of the driver's worker task, and the
|
|||
|
scheduler dispatches some other task to run while we are waiting.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Independently with the above...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a) The sensor application program performs a file_ops read() to collect a
|
|||
|
sample.
|
|||
|
b) The NuttX high level driver receives control, performs a thin layer of
|
|||
|
housekeeping and calls the sensor driver's read function.
|
|||
|
c) The sensor driver's read function copies the most recent sample from the
|
|||
|
worker task's data area to the application's buffer and returns.
|
|||
|
d) The NuttX high level driver receives control, performs a thin layer of
|
|||
|
housekeeping and returns.
|
|||
|
e) The application processes the sample.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Using a 216 MHz STM32F7 with no other activity occurring, we have timed the
|
|||
|
above the elapsed time for the above to be on average 45 microseconds.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Most sensor applications process data from multiple sensors. (An 9-DoF IMU
|
|||
|
is typically represented as three sensors (accelerometer, gyroscope, and
|
|||
|
magnetometer). In this case there are three copies of 1-10 occurring in
|
|||
|
parallel.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In applications where live data is being used, the context switch
|
|||
|
thrashing and cache pollution of this approach cripples system
|
|||
|
performance. In applications where sensor FIFO data is being used and
|
|||
|
therefore a large amount of data is collected per iteration, the non "zero
|
|||
|
copy" nature of the data collection becomes a performance issue.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Purpose:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The "Sensor Cluster Driver Interface" provides a standard mechanism for
|
|||
|
an application to collect data from multiple sensor drivers in a much more
|
|||
|
efficient manner. It significantly reduces the number of running tasks and
|
|||
|
the context thrashing and cache pollution caused by them. It also permits
|
|||
|
"zero copy" collection of sensor data.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Sensor Cluster Driver Interface uses a single "worker task" to be shared
|
|||
|
by an arbitrary number of drivers. This shared worker task is a kernel
|
|||
|
task that is registered like a driver, supports a driver interface to
|
|||
|
application programs, and collects data from multiple sensors (a cluster of
|
|||
|
sensors), we refer to it a "Sensor Cluster Driver".
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Its goal is to change the sequence of events detailed above to...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
1) A sensor "data ready" or timer interrupt occurs.
|
|||
|
2) Context is saved and and the cluster driver's interrupt handler is
|
|||
|
scheduled to run.
|
|||
|
3) The NuttX scheduler dispatches the cluster driver's interrupt handler
|
|||
|
task.
|
|||
|
4) The cluster driver's interrupt handler task posts to a semaphore that
|
|||
|
the cluster driver's worker task is waiting on.
|
|||
|
5) NuttX restores the context for the driver's worker task and starts it
|
|||
|
running.
|
|||
|
6) The cluster driver's worker task starts the i/o to collect the sample.
|
|||
|
There are two choices here. Programmed I/O (PIO) or DMA. If PIO is
|
|||
|
fastest for a small sample size, but it will lock up the processor for
|
|||
|
the full duration of the transfer; it can only transfer from one
|
|||
|
sensor at a time; and the worker task should manually yield control
|
|||
|
occasionally to permit other tasks to run. DMA has higher start and
|
|||
|
completion overhead, but it is much faster for long transfers, can
|
|||
|
perform simultaneous transfers from sensors on different buses, and
|
|||
|
automatically releases the processor while the transfer is occurring.
|
|||
|
For this reason our drivers allows the worker task to choose between
|
|||
|
PIO (driver_read()) and DMA (driver_exchange()), a common extension to
|
|||
|
the sensor_cluster_operations_s structure. So either way after one or
|
|||
|
more transfers we yield control and move to the next step. Note that
|
|||
|
the data is being transferred directly into the buffer provided by the
|
|||
|
application program; so no copy needs to be performed.
|
|||
|
7) The NuttX saves the context of the cluster driver's worker task, and the
|
|||
|
scheduler dispatches some other task to run while we are waiting.
|
|||
|
Again note that this is a good thing. This task is probably performing
|
|||
|
some other real work. We want this to happen during the data transfer.
|
|||
|
8) The completion of the last of the previous data transfers causes an
|
|||
|
interrupt. NuttX saves the current context and restores the cluster
|
|||
|
driver's worker task's context. If there is more sensor data to
|
|||
|
collect, then goto Step 6. Otherwise it posts to a semaphore that
|
|||
|
will wake the application.
|
|||
|
9) The driver's worker task goes to sleep waiting on the semaphore for the
|
|||
|
next sensor "data ready" or timer interrupt.
|
|||
|
10) The NuttX saves the context of the driver's worker task, and the
|
|||
|
scheduler dispatches some other task to run while we are waiting.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Independently with the above...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a) The sensor application program performs a file_ops read() to collect a
|
|||
|
sample.
|
|||
|
b) The NuttX high level driver receives control, performs a thin layer of
|
|||
|
housekeeping and calls the sensor driver's read function.
|
|||
|
c) The sensor driver's read function copies the most recent sample from the
|
|||
|
worker task's data area to the application's buffer and returns.
|
|||
|
d) The NuttX high level driver receives control, performs a thin layer of
|
|||
|
housekeeping and returns.
|
|||
|
e) The application processes the sample.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
So when collecting data from three sensors, this mechanism saved...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
* the handling of 2 sensor "data ready" or timer interrupts (Steps 1 - 4).
|
|||
|
* 2 occurrences of waking and scheduling of a worker task (Step 5).
|
|||
|
* 2 context switches to other tasks (Step 9 & 10)
|
|||
|
* if the three sensors were on separate buses, then 2 occurrences of
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Steps 6 - 8 could have also been saved.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
* An extra copy operation of the collected sensor data.
|
|||
|
* The cache pollution caused by 2 competing worker tasks.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Definitions:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Leaf Driver" - a kernel driver that implements the "Sensor Cluster Driver
|
|||
|
Interface" so that it can be called by Cluster drivers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Cluster Driver" - a kernel driver that uses the "Sensor Cluster Driver
|
|||
|
Interface" to call leaf drivers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Entry-Point Vector" - an array of function addresses to which a leaf driver
|
|||
|
will permit calls by a Cluster Driver.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Leaf Driver Instance Handle" - a pointer to an opaque Leaf Driver structure
|
|||
|
that identifies an instance of the leaf driver. Leaf Drivers store this
|
|||
|
handle in its configuration structure during registration.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sensor Cluster Interface description:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
* The definition of an entry-point vector. This is similar to the
|
|||
|
entry-point vector that is provided to the file-ops high level driver.
|
|||
|
This entry-point vector must include the sensor_cluster_operations_s
|
|||
|
structure as its first member.
|
|||
|
* The the definition of an driver entry-point vector member in the leaf
|
|||
|
driver's configuration structure. The leaf driver registration function
|
|||
|
must store the address of its entry-point vector in this field.
|
|||
|
* The the definition of an instance handle member in the leaf drivers
|
|||
|
configuration structure. The leaf driver registration function must store
|
|||
|
a handle (opaque pointer) to the instance of the leaf driver being
|
|||
|
registered in this field. Note that this should be the same handle that
|
|||
|
the leaf driver supplies to NuttX to register itself. The cluster driver
|
|||
|
will include this handle as a parameter in calls made to the leaf driver.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
.. code-block:: C
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
struct sensor_cluster_operations_s
|
|||
|
{
|
|||
|
CODE int (*driver_open)(FAR void *instance_handle, int32_t arg);
|
|||
|
CODE int (*driver_close)(FAR void *instance_handle, int32_t arg);
|
|||
|
CODE ssize_t (*driver_read)(FAR void *instance_handle, FAR char *buffer,
|
|||
|
size_t buflen);
|
|||
|
CODE ssize_t (*driver_write)(FAR void *instance_handle,
|
|||
|
FAR const char *buffer, size_t buflen);
|
|||
|
CODE off_t (*driver_seek)(FAR void *instance_handle, off_t offset,
|
|||
|
int whence);
|
|||
|
CODE int (*driver_ioctl)(FAR void *instance_handle, int cmd,
|
|||
|
unsigned long arg);
|
|||
|
CODE int (*driver_suspend)(FAR void *instance_handle, int32_t arg);
|
|||
|
CODE int (*driver_resume)(FAR void *instance_handle, int32_t arg);
|
|||
|
};
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Note that the sensor_cluster_operations_s strongly resembles the NuttX fs.h
|
|||
|
file_operations structures. This permits the current file_operations
|
|||
|
functions to become thin wrappers around these functions.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``driver_open()`` Same as the fs.h open() except that arg can be specify
|
|||
|
permitting more flexibility in sensor configuration and initial operation.
|
|||
|
when arg = 0 the function of driver_open() must be identical to open().
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``driver_close()`` Same as the fs.h close() except that arg can be specify
|
|||
|
permitting more flexibility in selecting a sensor low power state.
|
|||
|
when arg = 0 the function of driver_close() must be identical to close().
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``driver_read()`` Same as the fs.h read().
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``driver_write()`` Same as the fs.h write(). Optional. Set to NULL if not
|
|||
|
supported.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``driver_seek()`` Same as the fs.h seek(). Optional. Set to NULL if not
|
|||
|
supported.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``driver_ioctl()`` Same as the fs.h ioctl(). Optional. Set to NULL if not
|
|||
|
supported.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
``driver_suspend()`` and ``driver_resume()`` Optional. Set to NULL if not
|
|||
|
supported. It is common for sensor applications to conserve power and
|
|||
|
send their microcontroller into a low power sleep state. It seems
|
|||
|
appropriate to reserve these spots for future use. These driver entry
|
|||
|
points exist in Linux and Windows. Since microcontrollers and sensors
|
|||
|
get more capable every year, there should soon be a requirement for
|
|||
|
these entry points. Discussion on how to standardize their use and
|
|||
|
implementation should
|
|||
|
be taken up independently from this driver document.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Note that all drivers are encouraged to extend their entry-point vectors
|
|||
|
beyond this common segment. For example it may be beneficial for the
|
|||
|
worker task to select between programmed i/o and DMA data transfer
|
|||
|
routines. Unregulated extensions to the Entry-Point Vector should be
|
|||
|
encouraged to maximize the benefits of a sensor's features.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Operation:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Board logic (configs directory) will register the cluster driver. The
|
|||
|
cluster driver will register the leaf drivers that it will call.
|
|||
|
This means that the cluster driver has access to the leaf driver's
|
|||
|
configuration structures and can pass the Leaf Driver Instance Handle to
|
|||
|
the leaf driver as a parameter in calls made via the Entry-Point Vector.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Either board logic or an application program may open() the cluster
|
|||
|
driver. The cluster driver open() calls the open() function of the leaf
|
|||
|
drivers. The cluster driver open() or read() function can launch the
|
|||
|
shared worker task that collects the data.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The cluster driver close() function calls the close functions of the leaf
|
|||
|
drivers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ADT7320
|
|||
|
=======
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Contributed by Augusto Fraga Giachero
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The ADT7320 is a SPI temperature sensor with a temperature range of
|
|||
|
−40°C to +150°C.
|