nuttx/Documentation/components/libs/libxx.rst

61 lines
1.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

2023-10-25 15:21:50 +02:00
=====
libxx
=====
This directory contains three C++ library:
- A fragmentary C++ library that will allow to build only the simplest of
C++ applications. In the deeply embedded world, that is probably all
that is necessary.
At present, only the following are supported here:
.. code-block:: C
2023-10-25 15:21:50 +02:00
void *operator new(std::size_t nbytes)
.. code-block:: C
void operator delete(void* ptr)
.. code-block:: C
void operator delete[](void *ptr)
.. code-block:: C
void __cxa_pure_virtual(void)
.. code-block:: C
int __aeabi_atexit(void* object, void (*destroyer)(void*), void *dso_handle)
.. code-block:: C
int __cxa_atexit(__cxa_exitfunc_t func, FAR void *arg, FAR void *dso_handle)
This implementation is selected when neither of the following
two options are enabled.
2023-10-25 15:21:50 +02:00
- LLVM "libc++" C++ library (http://libcxx.llvm.org/)
This implementation is selected with CONFIG_LIBCXX=y.
- uClibc++ C++ library (http://cxx.uclibc.org/)
This implementation is selected with CONFIG_UCLIBCXX=y.
operator new
------------
This operator should take a type of ``size_t``. But size_t has an unknown underlying
type. In the nuttx ``sys/types.h`` header file, ``size_t`` is typed as ``uint32_t``
2023-10-25 15:21:50 +02:00
(which is determined by architecture-specific logic). But the C++
compiler may believe that ``size_t`` is of a different type resulting in
2023-10-25 15:21:50 +02:00
compilation errors in the operator. Using the underlying integer type
instead of size_t seems to resolve the compilation issues. Need to
REVISIT this.
Once some C++ compilers, this will cause an error::
Problem: "'operator new' takes size_t ('...') as first parameter"
Workaround: Add -fpermissive to the compilation flags