Update some comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
10069067c1
commit
2fd4925965
@ -89,7 +89,19 @@
|
||||
* that following message is simply a continuation of the transfer).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A proper I2C repeated start would then have I2C_M_NOSTOP set on msg[n]
|
||||
* and I2C_M_NOSTART *not* set on msg[n+1];
|
||||
* and I2C_M_NOSTART *not* set on msg[n+1]. See the following table:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* msg[n].flags msg[n+1].flags Behavior
|
||||
* ------------ --------------- -----------------------------------------
|
||||
* 0 0 Two normal, separate messages with STOP
|
||||
* on msg[n] then START on msg[n+1]
|
||||
* 0* I2C_M_NOSTART Continuation of the same transfer (must
|
||||
* be the same direction). See NOTE below.
|
||||
* NO_STOP 0 No STOP on msg[n]; repeated START on
|
||||
* msg[n+1].
|
||||
*
|
||||
* * NOTE: NO_STOP is implied in this case and may or not be explicitly
|
||||
* included in the msg[n] flags
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#define I2C_M_READ 0x0001 /* Read data, from slave to master */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user