SAMA5 LCDC: Back out the delay kludge. Increase the LCDC input clock from MCK to 2*MCK was sufficient for all timing instbility problems
This commit is contained in:
parent
424d47cfee
commit
8055a59d49
@ -2973,18 +2973,6 @@ int up_fbinitialize(void)
|
||||
sam_show_hcr();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(BOARD_LCDC_ENABLE_DELAY) && BOARD_LCDC_ENABLE_DELAY > 0
|
||||
/* Delay a bit after enabling the LDC. I presume that a delay of a few
|
||||
* frame times allows some unstable clocking to synchronize before we
|
||||
* start thrashing the framebuffer? But I am not sure why this is
|
||||
* necessary and, in fact, is certainly not necessary in most LCDC
|
||||
* configurations. Perhaps this delay would not be necessary if timings
|
||||
* were more precise?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
usleep(BOARD_LCDC_ENABLE_DELAY);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Enable the backlight.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* REVISIT: Backlight level could be dynamically adjustable
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user