Revert last change to the TODO list. There is no issue.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f03ee4875b
commit
913d013d8f
14
TODO
14
TODO
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
NuttX TODO List (Last updated September 18, 2018)
|
||||
NuttX TODO List (Last updated September 19, 2018)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
This file summarizes known NuttX bugs, limitations, inconsistencies with
|
||||
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ issues related to each board port.
|
||||
|
||||
nuttx/:
|
||||
|
||||
(16) Task/Scheduler (sched/)
|
||||
(15) Task/Scheduler (sched/)
|
||||
(3) SMP
|
||||
(1) Memory Management (mm/)
|
||||
(0) Power Management (drivers/pm)
|
||||
@ -367,16 +367,6 @@ o Task/Scheduler (sched/)
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
Priority: Low. Does anyone actually use the sporadic scheduler?
|
||||
|
||||
Title: PRIORITY INHERITANCE WITH ROUND ROBIN SCHEDULER
|
||||
Description: Priority Inheritance: (1) Round robin scheduling.. is boost
|
||||
priority respected? (2) Need to remember priority of the
|
||||
highest priority waiting task. We need this in several
|
||||
places: (a) Reprioritizing a task and (b) sporadic scheduler
|
||||
when priority goes down.
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
Priority: Potentially high. Need to determine if there really is an
|
||||
issue with priority inheritance and the round robin scheduler.
|
||||
|
||||
Title: SIMPLIFY SPORADIC SCHEDULER DESIGN
|
||||
Description: I have been planning to re-implement sporadic scheduling for
|
||||
some time. I believe that the current implementation is
|
||||
|
@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ int poll(FAR struct pollfd *fds, nfds_t nfds, int timeout)
|
||||
int errcode;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUGASSERT(fds != NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* poll() is a cancellation point */
|
||||
|
||||
(void)enter_cancellation_point();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user