sergiotarxz/nuttx
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Update a few comments

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Gregory Nutt 2015-12-10 06:32:27 -06:00
parent a0594ec60e
commit cb5c221ce7
2 changed files with 7 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
arch/arm/src/sama5/sam_udphs.c
View File

@ -2395,8 +2395,9 @@ static void sam_dma_interrupt(struct sam_usbdev_s *priv, int epno)
* REVISIT: On the SAMV7, I found that you really need to
* wait for the TX completion interrupt before calling
* sam_req_write(). For the SAMV7, the logic here just
* enables that TX completion interrupt. The symptom of
* the problem was occassional missing zero-length packets.
* enables that TX completion interrupt if BYCT > 0. The
* symptom of the problem was occasional missing zero-length
* packets because sam_req_write() was called too soon.
*/
DEBUGASSERT(USB_ISEPIN(privep->ep.eplog));

4
arch/arm/src/samv7/sam_usbdevhs.c
View File

@ -2524,6 +2524,10 @@ static void sam_dma_interrupt(struct sam_usbdev_s *priv, int epno)
/* All bytes have been sent to the host. We must call
* sam_req_write() now in the IDLE state with the number of
* bytes transferred in 'inflight'
*
* REVISIT: Isn't there a race condition here? Could TXIN
* have fired just before calculating byct? Could TXIN be
* pending here?
*/
privep->epstate = USBHS_EPSTATE_IDLE;