boards/z80/ez80/z20x/README.txt: Update README.
This commit is contained in:
parent
43dfbdb348
commit
e309128313
@ -95,6 +95,13 @@ Memory Constaints
|
||||
you enable assertions, debug outputs, or even debug symbols. It is very
|
||||
unlikely that the nsh_flash configuration will fit into FLASH at all!
|
||||
|
||||
I believe that there is some issue with the optimization CFLAGS used with
|
||||
the ZDS-II compiler. The size of the FLASH images that are generated are
|
||||
larger than you would see with, say, an equivalent Cortex-M compilation.
|
||||
I reviewed the individual object files. There is not one thing that is
|
||||
causing the large size. Rather, the ZDS-II compiler is simply generating
|
||||
larger CODE sections in the object files.
|
||||
|
||||
Serial Console
|
||||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
@ -212,12 +219,13 @@ Configuration Subdirectories
|
||||
information see: apps/system/nsh/README.txt and
|
||||
Documentation/NuttShell.html.
|
||||
|
||||
UNVERIFIED! I doubt that the nsh_flash program will fit into the
|
||||
smaller FLASH memory of the eZ80F92 part.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTES:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The two configurations different only in that one builds for
|
||||
1. UNVERIFIED! I doubt that the nsh_flash program will fit into the
|
||||
smaller FLASH memory of the eZ80F92 part. See discusssion under
|
||||
"Memory Constraints" above.
|
||||
|
||||
2. The two configurations different only in that one builds for
|
||||
execution entirely from FLASH and the other for execution entirely
|
||||
from RAM. A bootloader of some kind is required to support such
|
||||
execution from RAM! This difference is reflected in a single
|
||||
@ -237,7 +245,7 @@ Configuration Subdirectories
|
||||
Why execute from SRAM at all? Because you will get MUCH better
|
||||
performance because of the zero wait state SRAM implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
2. The eZ80 RTC, the procFS file system, and SD card support in included.
|
||||
3. The eZ80 RTC, the procFS file system, and SD card support in included.
|
||||
The procFS file system will be auto-mounted at /proc when the board
|
||||
boots.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -304,7 +312,7 @@ Configuration Subdirectories
|
||||
NOTE: The is no card detect signal so the microSD card must be
|
||||
placed in the card slot before the system is started.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Debugging the RAM version
|
||||
4. Debugging the RAM version
|
||||
|
||||
You can debug the all RAM version using ZDS-II as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -315,7 +323,7 @@ Configuration Subdirectories
|
||||
d. Single step a few times to make sure things look good, then
|
||||
e. Go
|
||||
|
||||
4. Optimizations:
|
||||
5. Optimizations:
|
||||
|
||||
- The stack sizes have not been tuned and, hence, are probably too
|
||||
large.
|
||||
@ -331,3 +339,13 @@ Configuration Subdirectories
|
||||
SRAM.
|
||||
|
||||
The boot loader source is located at boards/z20x/src/sd_main.c.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTES:
|
||||
|
||||
1. This version of the eZ80 bootloader is not usable in its current
|
||||
state. That is because the the eZ80F92 Interrupt Controller is
|
||||
not as robust as the eZ80F91 Interrupt Controller. A consequence
|
||||
is that the interrupt vectors must always reside within the first
|
||||
64Kb of FLASH memory. It will not be possible to run programs in
|
||||
SRAM *unless* some mechanism is developed to redirect interrupts
|
||||
from ROM and into loaded SRAM logic.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user