semaphore: Cleanup, merge public code.
Signed-off-by: Zeng Zhaoxiu <walker.zeng@transtekcorp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5bf7c185af
commit
ea8f5f565e
@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ nxsem_allocholder(FAR sem_t *sem, FAR struct tcb_s *htcb)
|
||||
*
|
||||
****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
static FAR struct semholder_s *nxsem_findholder(sem_t *sem,
|
||||
FAR struct tcb_s *htcb)
|
||||
static FAR struct semholder_s *
|
||||
nxsem_findholder(FAR sem_t *sem, FAR struct tcb_s *htcb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FAR struct semholder_s *pholder;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static FAR struct semholder_s *nxsem_findholder(sem_t *sem,
|
||||
****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
static inline FAR struct semholder_s *
|
||||
nxsem_findorallocateholder(sem_t *sem, FAR struct tcb_s *htcb)
|
||||
nxsem_findorallocateholder(FAR sem_t *sem, FAR struct tcb_s *htcb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FAR struct semholder_s *pholder = nxsem_findholder(sem, htcb);
|
||||
if (!pholder)
|
||||
@ -237,22 +237,23 @@ static inline void nxsem_freeholder(FAR sem_t *sem,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
* Name: nxsem_findandfreeholder
|
||||
* Name: nxsem_freecount0holder
|
||||
****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void nxsem_findandfreeholder(sem_t *sem,
|
||||
FAR struct tcb_s *htcb)
|
||||
static int nxsem_freecount0holder(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder,
|
||||
FAR sem_t *sem, FAR void *arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FAR struct semholder_s *pholder = nxsem_findholder(sem, htcb);
|
||||
|
||||
/* When no more counts are held, remove the holder from the list. The
|
||||
* count was decremented in nxsem_release_holder.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (pholder != NULL && pholder->counts <= 0)
|
||||
if (pholder->counts <= 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nxsem_freeholder(sem, pholder);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
@ -473,9 +474,10 @@ static int nxsem_dumpholder(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder, FAR sem_t *sem,
|
||||
* Name: nxsem_restoreholderprio
|
||||
****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
static int nxsem_restoreholderprio(FAR struct tcb_s *htcb,
|
||||
static int nxsem_restoreholderprio(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder,
|
||||
FAR sem_t *sem, FAR void *arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FAR struct tcb_s *htcb = pholder->htcb;
|
||||
#if CONFIG_SEM_NNESTPRIO > 0
|
||||
FAR struct tcb_s *stcb = (FAR struct tcb_s *)arg;
|
||||
int rpriority;
|
||||
@ -483,6 +485,15 @@ static int nxsem_restoreholderprio(FAR struct tcb_s *htcb,
|
||||
int j;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Release the holder if all counts have been given up
|
||||
* before reprioritizing causes a context switch.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (pholder->counts <= 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nxsem_freeholder(sem, pholder);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Was the priority of the holder thread boosted? If so, then drop its
|
||||
* priority back to the correct level. What is the correct level?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -599,20 +610,6 @@ static int nxsem_restoreholderprio(FAR struct tcb_s *htcb,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
* Name: nxsem_restoreholderprioall
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Description:
|
||||
* Reprioritize all holders
|
||||
*
|
||||
****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
static int nxsem_restoreholderprioall(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder,
|
||||
FAR sem_t *sem, FAR void *arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return nxsem_restoreholderprio(pholder->htcb, sem, arg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
* Name: nxsem_restoreholderprio_others
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -627,7 +624,7 @@ static int nxsem_restoreholderprio_others(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder,
|
||||
FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb = this_task();
|
||||
if (pholder->htcb != rtcb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return nxsem_restoreholderprio(pholder->htcb, sem, arg);
|
||||
return nxsem_restoreholderprio(pholder, sem, arg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -650,16 +647,7 @@ static int nxsem_restoreholderprio_self(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder,
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* The running task has given up a count on the semaphore */
|
||||
|
||||
#if CONFIG_SEM_PREALLOCHOLDERS == 0
|
||||
/* In the case where there are only 2 holders. This step
|
||||
* is necessary to ensure we have space. Release the holder
|
||||
* if all counts have been given up before reprioritizing
|
||||
* causes a context switch.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
nxsem_findandfreeholder(sem, rtcb);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
nxsem_restoreholderprio(rtcb, sem, arg);
|
||||
nxsem_restoreholderprio(pholder, sem, arg);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -700,31 +688,10 @@ static int nxsem_restoreholderprio_self(FAR struct semholder_s *pholder,
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void nxsem_restore_baseprio_irq(FAR struct tcb_s *stcb,
|
||||
FAR sem_t *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Perform the following actions only if a new thread was given a count.
|
||||
* The thread that received the count should be the highest priority
|
||||
* of all threads waiting for a count from the semaphore. So in that
|
||||
* case, the priority of all holder threads should be dropped to the
|
||||
* next highest pending priority.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (stcb != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Drop the priority of all holder threads */
|
||||
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_restoreholderprioall, stcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If there are no tasks waiting for available counts, then all holders
|
||||
* should be at their base priority.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_verifyholder, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_restoreholderprio, stcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
@ -761,17 +728,6 @@ static inline void nxsem_restore_baseprio_irq(FAR struct tcb_s *stcb,
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void nxsem_restore_baseprio_task(FAR struct tcb_s *stcb,
|
||||
FAR sem_t *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb = this_task();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Perform the following actions only if a new thread was given a count.
|
||||
* The thread that received the count should be the highest priority
|
||||
* of all threads waiting for a count from the semaphore. So in that
|
||||
* case, the priority of all holder threads should be dropped to the
|
||||
* next highest pending priority.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (stcb != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* The currently executed thread should be the lower priority
|
||||
* thread that just posted the count and caused this action.
|
||||
@ -789,25 +745,6 @@ static inline void nxsem_restore_baseprio_task(FAR struct tcb_s *stcb,
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_restoreholderprio_self, stcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If there are no tasks waiting for available counts, then all holders
|
||||
* should be at their base priority.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_verifyholder, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* In any case, the currently executing task should have an entry in the
|
||||
* list. Its counts were previously decremented; if it now holds no
|
||||
* counts, then we need to remove it from the list of holders.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
nxsem_findandfreeholder(sem, rtcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
* Public Functions
|
||||
****************************************************************************/
|
||||
@ -1070,6 +1007,15 @@ void nxsem_restore_baseprio(FAR struct tcb_s *stcb, FAR sem_t *sem)
|
||||
(sem->semcount <= 0 && stcb != NULL));
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* Perform the following actions only if a new thread was given a count.
|
||||
* The thread that received the count should be the highest priority
|
||||
* of all threads waiting for a count from the semaphore. So in that
|
||||
* case, the priority of all holder threads should be dropped to the
|
||||
* next highest pending priority.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (stcb != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Handler semaphore counts posed from an interrupt handler differently
|
||||
* from interrupts posted from threads. The primary difference is that
|
||||
* if the semaphore is posted from a thread, then the poster thread is
|
||||
@ -1087,6 +1033,21 @@ void nxsem_restore_baseprio(FAR struct tcb_s *stcb, FAR sem_t *sem)
|
||||
nxsem_restore_baseprio_task(stcb, sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Remove the holder from the list if it's counts is zero. */
|
||||
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_freecount0holder, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If there are no tasks waiting for available counts, then all holders
|
||||
* should be at their base priority.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_verifyholder, NULL);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
* Name: nxsem_canceled
|
||||
@ -1115,7 +1076,7 @@ void nxsem_canceled(FAR struct tcb_s *stcb, FAR sem_t *sem)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Adjust the priority of every holder as necessary */
|
||||
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_restoreholderprioall, stcb);
|
||||
nxsem_foreachholder(sem, nxsem_restoreholderprio, stcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/****************************************************************************
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user