It may cause out_of_bounds when two side have different configuartion
on NAME_MAX and FS_LARGEFILE(affects size of blkcnt_t)
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
it may cause use after free if server has removed block device before calling
its operations,such as:
server: rm /dev/testrpmsgblk
client: ls /dev/testrpmsgblk
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
A segmentfault might happen when read/write/unlink ops called without an open
ops called because it bind ept's ops in rpmsgblk_open_handler.
proxy> rm /dev/ram1
segmentfault
proxy> ls /dev/ram1
segmentfault
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
In function ‘rpmsgblk_unlink_handler’:
misc/rpmsgblk_server.c:340:36: error: ‘const struct block_operations’ has no member named ‘unlink’
340 | msg->header.result = server->bops->unlink(server->blknode);
|
Signed-off-by: chao an <anchao@xiaomi.com>
Like rpmsgdev and rpmsgmtd, rpmsgblk allow the local cpu to
access the block device in the remote cpu.
Signed-off-by: wangbowen6 <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
