Add support for the STM32G474 family of microcontrollers and the
B-G474E-DPOW1 Discovery Board, which features a STM32G474RET6.
This is a major pull request as it adds support for an entirely
new family of STM32. This support is implemented in
arch/arm/src/stm32 and shares implementation with other STM32
families supported by that code, such as the 'L15xx, 'F10xx,
'F20xx, 'F3xxx, and 'F4xxx.
boards/Kconfig:
* Make NuttX recognize the existence of b-g474e-dpow1,
the B-G474E-DPOW1 Discovery Board.
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/Kconfig:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/README.txt:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/configs/nsh/defconfig:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/include/board.h:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/scripts/Make.defs:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/scripts/ld.script:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/src/.gitignore:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/src/Make.defs:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/src/b-g474e-dpow1.h:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/src/stm32_appinit.c:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/src/stm32_autoleds.c:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/src/stm32_boot.c:
boards/arm/stm32/b-g474e-dpow1/src/stm32_userleds.c:
* Add minimal support for the B-G474E-DPOW1 Discovery
Board. The board boots successfully through to the
NSH prompt. NSH runs and is responsive.
With big thanks for detailed code review and suggestions:
David Sidrane (davids5)
Mateusz Szafoni (raiden00)
Abdelatif Guettouche (Ouss4)
Add support for the STM32G474 family of microcontrollers and the
B-G474E-DPOW1 Discovery Board, which features a STM32G474RET6.
This is a major pull request as it adds support for an entirely
new family of STM32. This support is implemented in
arch/arm/src/stm32 and shares implementation with other STM32
families supported by that code, such as the 'L15xx, 'F10xx,
'F20xx, 'F3xxx, and 'F4xxx.
arch/arm/Kconfig:
arch/arm/include/stm32/chip.h:
arch/arm/include/stm32/irq.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/Kconfig:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_adc.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_adc_v2.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_dma.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_dma_v1.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_flash.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_i2c.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_i2c_v2.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_memorymap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_pinmap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_tim.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_allocateheap.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_dma.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_dma_v1.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_dumpgpio.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_gpio.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_gpio.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_lowputc.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_rcc.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_rcc.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_serial.c:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_syscfg.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32_uart.h:
* Add architectural support to existing NuttX files. This
makes the STM32G474 family parts accessible to the system.
With big thanks for detailed code review:
David Sidrane (davids5)
Mateusz Szafoni (raiden00)
Abdelatif Guettouche (Ouss4)
Add support for the STM32G474 family of microcontrollers and the
B-G474E-DPOW1 Discovery Board, which features a STM32G474RET6.
This is a major pull request as it adds support for an entirely
new family of STM32. This support is implemented in
arch/arm/src/stm32 and shares implementation with other STM32
families supported by that code, such as the 'L15xx, 'F10xx,
'F20xx, 'F3xxx, and 'F4xxx.
arch/arm/include/stm32/stm32g47xxx_irq.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g474cxx_pinmap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g474mxx_pinmap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g474qxx_pinmap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g474rxx_pinmap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g474vxx_pinmap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g47xxx_gpio.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g47xxx_memorymap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g47xxx_pinmap.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g47xxx_pwr.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g47xxx_rcc.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g47xxx_syscfg.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32g47xxx_uart.h:
arch/arm/src/stm32/stm32g47xxx_rcc.c:
* New files required for architectural support. Note that
existing NuttX files are not modified. As such, in this
revision, the system is unaffected by their addition.
With big thanks for detailed code review:
David Sidrane (davids5)
Mateusz Szafoni (raiden00)
Abdelatif Guettouche (Ouss4)
Functions within the OS must never set the errno value. fs_fdopen() was setting the errno value. Now, after some parameter changes, it reports errors via a negated errno integer return value as do most all other internal OS functions.
Use absolute path for APPDIR which could be used by apps clean
and distclean subdir build. Parallel clean and distclean subdir
could save more build time.
Signed-off-by: liuhaitao <liuhaitao@xiaomi.com>
Documentation/NuttXCCodingStandard.html:
- Fix a typo: "be aligned so that the comment begins in the same comment on each line." Of course that should have been column.
- Update a coding standard requirement. With regard to Comments to the Right of Statements, the document said: "If such comments are used, they should ... fit on one line." This is not true any more. In common practice (include the checks in nxstyle), comments to the right of statements may be continued in the following line. The standard way of continuing such comments was also documented.
In this case the coding standard actually contradicted iteself since first it says the that the comments to the right must fit on one line, but later illustrates (without description) how to continue a long right hand comment on the following line.
Documents/style.css: It appears that a variable width font was being used for <pre> and <code>, that was really screwing up the presentation, especially in the coding standared where there are many examples illustrating correct vertical alignment. The font type "Bitstream Vera Sans Mono" was replaced with "courier" for <pre> and <code>
