Purpose: make the the os crash when busyloop with interrupt disable
Follow the arm gicv2 spec, if we want to use the IRQ and FIQ
simultaneously when not using the processor Security Externsions.
We should:
1. IRQ to Group 1 and FIQ to Group 0;
2. Set CICC_CTLR.FIQEn to 1;
Then in NuttX:
1. implement the arm_decodefiq and directly crash in it;
2. provide interface to change the IRQ to FIQ, e.g. change the
watchdog IRQ to FIQ, so the watchdog can trigger even with the
interrupt disabled (up_irq_save() called);
Signed-off-by: wangbowen6 <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: ligd <liguiding1@xiaomi.com>
cpu0 thread0: cpu1:
sched_yield()
nxsched_set_priority()
nxsched_running_setpriority()
nxsched_reprioritize_rtr()
nxsched_add_readytorun()
up_cpu_pause()
IRQ enter
arm64_pause_handler()
enter_critical_section() begin
up_cpu_paused() pick thread0
arm64_restorestate() set thread0 tcb->xcp.regs to CURRENT_REGS
up_switch_context()
thread0 -> thread1
arm64_syscall()
case SYS_switch_context
change thread0 tcb->xcp.regs
restore_critical_section()
enter_critical_section() done
leave_critical_section()
IRQ leave with restore CURRENT_REGS
ERROR !!!
Reason:
As descript above, cpu0 swith task: thread0 -> thread1, and the
syscall() execute slowly, this time cpu1 pick thread0 to run at
up_cpu_paused(). Then cpu0 syscall execute, cpu1 IRQ leave error.
Resolve:
Move arm64_restorestate() after enter_critical_section() done
This is a continued fix with:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/6833
Signed-off-by: ligd <liguiding1@xiaomi.com>
Adding the CONFIG_ARCH_PERF_EVENTS configuration to enable
hardware performance counting，solve the problem that some platform
hardware counting support is not perfect, you can choose to use
software interface.
This is configured using CONFIG_ARCH_PERF_EVENTS, so weak_functions
are removed to prevent confusion
To use hardware performance counting, must:
1. Configure CONFIG_ARCH_PERF_EVENTS, default selection
2. Call up_perf_init for initialization
Signed-off-by: wangming9 <wangming9@xiaomi.com>
We can use the driver in nuttx to download
files with debugger
Signed-off-by: anjiahao <anjiahao@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: chao an <anchao@xiaomi.com>
When supporting high-priority interrupts, updating the
g_running_tasks within a high-priority interrupt may be
cause problems. The g_running_tasks should only be updated
when it is determined that a task context switch has occurred.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
According to the ARMv7a/r/m and ARMv8m architecture manuals
The allowed values are
0 Data or unified cache.
1 Instruction cache.
"One CCSIDR is implemented for each cache that can be accessed by the processor. CSSELR selects which Cache Size ID Register is accessible, see c0, Cache Size Selection Register (CSSELR)."
Signed-off-by: chenrun1 <chenrun1@xiaomi.com>
to avoid the infinite recusive dispatch:
*0 myhandler (signo=27, info=0xf3e38b9c, context=0x0) at ltp/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sigqueue/7-1.c:39
*1 0x58f1c39e in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:167
*2 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*3 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049334) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*4 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049334) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*5 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*6 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*7 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*8 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049304) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*9 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049304) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*10 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*11 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*12 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*13 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492d4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*14 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492d4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*15 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*16 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*17 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*18 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492a4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*19 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492a4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*20 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*21 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*22 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*23 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049274) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*24 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049274) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*25 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*26 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*27 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*28 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049244) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*29 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049244) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*30 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*31 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
in SMP, signal processing cannot be nested, we use xcp.sigdeliver to identify whether there is currently a signal being processed, but this state does not match the actual situation
One possible scenario is that signal processing has already been completed, but an interrupt occurs, resulting in xcp.sigdeliver not being correctly set to NULL,
At this point, a new signal arrives, which can only be placed in the queue and cannot be processed immediately
Our solution is that signal processing and signal complete status are set in the same critical section, which can ensure status synchronization
Signed-off-by: hujun5 <hujun5@xiaomi.com>
CURRENT_REGS may change during assert handling, so pass
in the 'regs' parameter at the entry point of _assert.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
When l2cc is already in disable state, performing a disable operation
again will flush incorrect cache data to memory
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
Invalidate operations at DDI0246H_l2c310_r3p3_trm:
If there is a stale entry in the L2 cache, the system enables the invalidation of
the L1 cache. But before the controller invalidates the L2 cache, it allocates a
line from the L2 cache to an L1 cache.
The robust code sequence for invalidation with a non-exclusive cache arrangement is:
1. InvalLevel2 Address ; forces the address out past level 2
2. CACHE SYNC ; Ensures completion of the L2 inval
3. InvalLevel1 Address ; This is broadcast within the cluster
4. DSB ; Ensure completion of the inval as far as Level 2.
This sequence ensures that, if there is an allocation to L1 after the L1 invalidation, the data
picked up is the new data and not stale data from the L2
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
minidump will backtrace failure when use C code to save user context,
because the stack push operation in C code can disrupt the stack information.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
The text describes an issue related to the running task in code.
The running task is only used when calling the _assert function
to indicate the task that was running before an exception occurred.
However, the current code only updates the running task during
irq_dispatch, which is suitable for ARM-M architecture but not
for ARM-A or ARM-R architecture, because their context switches
are not done through irq handler. Therefore, if the following
process is followed, the value of the running task will be incorrect:
1. task1 is running, this_task()=task1
2. do_irq is executed, setting running task()=task1
3. task1 switches to task2
4. task2 is running and generates a data abort
5. In the data abort, the _assert function is called,
and the running task obtained is still task1, but
the actual task that generated the exception is task2.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
On a GICv2 implementation, setting GICC_CTLR.EOImode to 1 separates
the priority drop and interrupt deactivation operations.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
