When the toolchain does not support atomic, it will use the version implemented by NuttX (low performance version). This scenario is consistent with the original design, so we can ignore it.
see bug here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
Error: inode/fs_inodeaddref.c:50:7: error: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (4 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (0 bytes) [-Werror,-Watomic-alignment]
50 | atomic_fetch_add(&inode->i_crefs, 1);
| ^
/tools/clang-arm-none-eabi/lib/clang/17/include/stdatomic.h:152:43: note: expanded from macro 'atomic_fetch_add'
152 | #define atomic_fetch_add(object, operand) __c11_atomic_fetch_add(object, operand, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)
| ^
1 error generated.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:83: fs_inodeaddref.o] Error 1
Error: inode/fs_inodefind.c:74:7: error: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (4 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (0 bytes) [-Werror,-Watomic-alignment]
74 | atomic_fetch_add(&node->i_crefs, 1);
Signed-off-by: chenrun1 <chenrun1@xiaomi.com>
ab4d72756e