Now we have CONFIG_USEC_PER_TICK, and for our timer system, all the calculation used 'tick'.
And all the timespec should change to 'tick' before use wd_start(), so USEC2TICK() can NOT be avoided.
Then there must be an 'less then one tick' loss.
One resolution:
ticks++ anyway when wd_start(). But this will caused time expired more a tick.
Another resolution:
Change the testcase, and allow the following logic:
t1 = current_time();
sleep(3);
t2 = current_time();
allow: t2 - t1 >= 3;
(original test must be: t2- t1 > 3)
The original test think the time must be elapse-ing, and the (t2 - t1) must bigger then 3,
but in our system, we use 'tick' as the minimal wdog unit, then there must a precision loss.
Now we choose first resolution.
Signed-off-by: ligd <liguiding1@xiaomi.com>
cb5bab34f1