I noticed that the conn instance will leak during stress test,
The close work queued from tcp_close_eventhandler() will be canceled
by tcp_timer() immediately:
Breakpoint 1, tcp_close_eventhandler (dev=0x565cd338 <up_irq_restore+108>, pvpriv=0x5655e6ff <getpid+12>, flags=0) at tcp/tcp_close.c:71
(gdb) bt
| #0 tcp_close_eventhandler (dev=0x565cd338 <up_irq_restore+108>, pvpriv=0x5655e6ff <getpid+12>, flags=0) at tcp/tcp_close.c:71
| #1 0x5658bf1e in devif_conn_event (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, flags=512, list=0x5660d558 <g_cbprealloc+312>) at devif/devif_callback.c:508
| #2 0x5658a219 in tcp_callback (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, conn=0x5660c4a0 <g_tcp_connections>, flags=512) at tcp/tcp_callback.c:167
| #3 0x56589253 in tcp_timer (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, conn=0x5660c4a0 <g_tcp_connections>) at tcp/tcp_timer.c:378
| #4 0x5658dd47 in tcp_poll (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, conn=0x5660c4a0 <g_tcp_connections>) at tcp/tcp_devpoll.c:95
| #5 0x5658b95f in devif_poll_tcp_connections (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, callback=0x565770f2 <netdriver_txpoll>) at devif/devif_poll.c:601
| #6 0x5658b9ea in devif_poll (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, callback=0x565770f2 <netdriver_txpoll>) at devif/devif_poll.c:722
| #7 0x56577230 in netdriver_txavail_work (arg=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>) at sim/up_netdriver.c:308
| #8 0x5655999e in work_thread (argc=2, argv=0xf3db5dd0) at wqueue/kwork_thread.c:178
| #9 0x5655983f in nxtask_start () at task/task_start.c:129
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, tcp_update_timer (conn=0x5660c4a0 <g_tcp_connections>) at tcp/tcp_timer.c:178
(gdb) bt
| #0 tcp_update_timer (conn=0x5660c4a0 <g_tcp_connections>) at tcp/tcp_timer.c:178
| #1 0x5658952a in tcp_timer (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, conn=0x5660c4a0 <g_tcp_connections>) at tcp/tcp_timer.c:708
| #2 0x5658dd47 in tcp_poll (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, conn=0x5660c4a0 <g_tcp_connections>) at tcp/tcp_devpoll.c:95
| #3 0x5658b95f in devif_poll_tcp_connections (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, callback=0x565770f2 <netdriver_txpoll>) at devif/devif_poll.c:601
| #4 0x5658b9ea in devif_poll (dev=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>, callback=0x565770f2 <netdriver_txpoll>) at devif/devif_poll.c:722
| #5 0x56577230 in netdriver_txavail_work (arg=0x5660bd80 <g_sim_dev>) at sim/up_netdriver.c:308
| #6 0x5655999e in work_thread (argc=2, argv=0xf3db5dd0) at wqueue/kwork_thread.c:178
| #7 0x5655983f in nxtask_start () at task/task_start.c:129
Since a separate work will add 24 bytes to each conn instance,
but in order to support the feature of asynchronous close(),
I can not find a better way than adding a separate work,
for resource constraints, I recommend the developers to enable
CONFIG_NET_ALLOC_CONNS, which will reduce the ram usage.
Signed-off-by: chao an <anchao@xiaomi.com>
e46688c1ee