nuttx/boards/arm/stm32f0l0g0/stm32f051-discovery
Xiang Xiao ee875b2a26 boards: Move HOSTCC/HOSTCFLAGS to tools/Config.mk
Make.defs under board folder can still overwrite the default as needed

Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
Change-Id: I1c300a8ace4b54d475ef8d398661ed65ca273a2e
2020-07-15 19:14:58 +01:00
..
configs/nsh Fix up some problems/issues remaining from PR 1007 2020-05-08 20:13:40 +01:00
include Refine the preprocessor conditional guard style (#190) 2020-01-31 19:07:39 +01:00
scripts boards: Move HOSTCC/HOSTCFLAGS to tools/Config.mk 2020-07-15 19:14:58 +01:00
src drivers/led: Extend userled_set_t from 8bits to 32bits 2020-06-07 19:28:10 +01:00
Kconfig Merged in alinjerpelea/nuttx (pull request #967) 2019-08-07 20:49:39 +00:00
README.txt Merged in alinjerpelea/nuttx (pull request #967) 2019-08-07 20:49:39 +00:00

STATUS
======

05/17: The basic NSH configuration is functional and shows that there is
       3-4KB of free heap space.  However, attempts to extend this have
       failed.  I suspect that 8KB of SRAM is insufficient to do much
       with the existing NSH configuration.  Perhaps some fine tuning
       can improve this situation but at this point, I think this board
       is only useful for the initial STM32 F0 bring-up, perhaps for
       embedded solutions that do not use NSH and for general
       experimentation.

       There is also support for the Nucleo boards with the STM32 F072
       and F092 MCUs.  Those ports do not suffer from these problems and
       seem to work well in fairly complex configurations.  Apparently 8KB
       is SRAM is not usable but the parts with larger 16KB and 32KB SRAMs
       are better matches.