66aea0b5df
While all of elfutils does not build with clang, the libelf part does and is needed by ltrace. So keep libelf as a package and let it replace elfutils for now.
129 lines
4.9 KiB
Diff
129 lines
4.9 KiB
Diff
diff -u -r ../elfutils-0.159/libelf/elf_getarsym.c ./libelf/elf_getarsym.c
|
|
--- ../elfutils-0.159/libelf/elf_getarsym.c 2014-05-18 16:32:15.000000000 +0200
|
|
+++ ./libelf/elf_getarsym.c 2014-05-30 14:53:58.602211085 +0200
|
|
@@ -45,6 +45,124 @@
|
|
#include <dl-hash.h>
|
|
#include "libelfP.h"
|
|
|
|
+#ifdef __ANDROID__
|
|
+/* Find the first occurrence of C in S. */
|
|
+void *
|
|
+rawmemchr (const void *s, int c_in)
|
|
+{
|
|
+ /* On 32-bit hardware, choosing longword to be a 32-bit unsigned
|
|
+ long instead of a 64-bit uintmax_t tends to give better
|
|
+ performance. On 64-bit hardware, unsigned long is generally 64
|
|
+ bits already. Change this typedef to experiment with
|
|
+ performance. */
|
|
+ typedef unsigned long int longword;
|
|
+
|
|
+ const unsigned char *char_ptr;
|
|
+ const longword *longword_ptr;
|
|
+ longword repeated_one;
|
|
+ longword repeated_c;
|
|
+ unsigned char c;
|
|
+
|
|
+ c = (unsigned char) c_in;
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* Handle the first few bytes by reading one byte at a time.
|
|
+ Do this until CHAR_PTR is aligned on a longword boundary. */
|
|
+ for (char_ptr = (const unsigned char *) s;
|
|
+ (size_t) char_ptr % sizeof (longword) != 0;
|
|
+ ++char_ptr)
|
|
+ if (*char_ptr == c)
|
|
+ return (void *) char_ptr;
|
|
+
|
|
+ longword_ptr = (const longword *) char_ptr;
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* All these elucidatory comments refer to 4-byte longwords,
|
|
+ but the theory applies equally well to any size longwords. */
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* Compute auxiliary longword values:
|
|
+ repeated_one is a value which has a 1 in every byte.
|
|
+ repeated_c has c in every byte. */
|
|
+ repeated_one = 0x01010101;
|
|
+ repeated_c = c | (c << 8);
|
|
+ repeated_c |= repeated_c << 16;
|
|
+ if (0xffffffffU < (longword) -1)
|
|
+ {
|
|
+ repeated_one |= repeated_one << 31 << 1;
|
|
+ repeated_c |= repeated_c << 31 << 1;
|
|
+ if (8 < sizeof (longword))
|
|
+ {
|
|
+ size_t i;
|
|
+
|
|
+ for (i = 64; i < sizeof (longword) * 8; i *= 2)
|
|
+ {
|
|
+ repeated_one |= repeated_one << i;
|
|
+ repeated_c |= repeated_c << i;
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ }
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* Instead of the traditional loop which tests each byte, we will
|
|
+ test a longword at a time. The tricky part is testing if *any of
|
|
+ the four* bytes in the longword in question are equal to NUL or
|
|
+ c. We first use an xor with repeated_c. This reduces the task
|
|
+ to testing whether *any of the four* bytes in longword1 is zero.
|
|
+
|
|
+ We compute tmp =
|
|
+ ((longword1 - repeated_one) & ~longword1) & (repeated_one << 7).
|
|
+ That is, we perform the following operations:
|
|
+ 1. Subtract repeated_one.
|
|
+ 2. & ~longword1.
|
|
+ 3. & a mask consisting of 0x80 in every byte.
|
|
+ Consider what happens in each byte:
|
|
+ - If a byte of longword1 is zero, step 1 and 2 transform it into 0xff,
|
|
+ and step 3 transforms it into 0x80. A carry can also be propagated
|
|
+ to more significant bytes.
|
|
+ - If a byte of longword1 is nonzero, let its lowest 1 bit be at
|
|
+ position k (0 <= k <= 7); so the lowest k bits are 0. After step 1,
|
|
+ the byte ends in a single bit of value 0 and k bits of value 1.
|
|
+ After step 2, the result is just k bits of value 1: 2^k - 1. After
|
|
+ step 3, the result is 0. And no carry is produced.
|
|
+ So, if longword1 has only non-zero bytes, tmp is zero.
|
|
+ Whereas if longword1 has a zero byte, call j the position of the least
|
|
+ significant zero byte. Then the result has a zero at positions 0, ...,
|
|
+ j-1 and a 0x80 at position j. We cannot predict the result at the more
|
|
+ significant bytes (positions j+1..3), but it does not matter since we
|
|
+ already have a non-zero bit at position 8*j+7.
|
|
+
|
|
+ The test whether any byte in longword1 is zero is equivalent
|
|
+ to testing whether tmp is nonzero.
|
|
+
|
|
+ This test can read beyond the end of a string, depending on where
|
|
+ C_IN is encountered. However, this is considered safe since the
|
|
+ initialization phase ensured that the read will be aligned,
|
|
+ therefore, the read will not cross page boundaries and will not
|
|
+ cause a fault. */
|
|
+
|
|
+ while (1)
|
|
+ {
|
|
+ longword longword1 = *longword_ptr ^ repeated_c;
|
|
+
|
|
+ if ((((longword1 - repeated_one) & ~longword1)
|
|
+ & (repeated_one << 7)) != 0)
|
|
+ break;
|
|
+ longword_ptr++;
|
|
+ }
|
|
+
|
|
+ char_ptr = (const unsigned char *) longword_ptr;
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* At this point, we know that one of the sizeof (longword) bytes
|
|
+ starting at char_ptr is == c. On little-endian machines, we
|
|
+ could determine the first such byte without any further memory
|
|
+ accesses, just by looking at the tmp result from the last loop
|
|
+ iteration. But this does not work on big-endian machines.
|
|
+ Choose code that works in both cases. */
|
|
+
|
|
+ char_ptr = (unsigned char *) longword_ptr;
|
|
+ while (*char_ptr != c)
|
|
+ char_ptr++;
|
|
+ return (void *) char_ptr;
|
|
+}
|
|
+#endif
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
read_number_entries (uint64_t *nump, Elf *elf, size_t *offp, bool index64_p)
|