Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Xiang Xiao
9e4a1be8d4 mm/iob: Replace the critical section with spin lock
Base on discusion: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/10981

Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
2023-10-30 11:18:34 +02:00
Alin Jerpelea
bcee9c391c mm: Author Gregory Nutt: update licenses to Apache
Gregory Nutt has submitted the SGA and we can mograte the licenses
to Apache.

Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
2021-02-09 01:21:53 -08:00
Xiang Xiao
5c80b94820 Replace #include <semaphore.h> to #include <nuttx/semaphore.h>
Since the kernel side should call nxsem_xxx instead and remove the unused inclusion
2020-02-01 08:27:30 -06:00
Xiang Xiao
1ecc33b7db mm/iob: Miscellaneous changes and fixes from code review. 2019-01-26 09:56:27 -06:00
Gregory Nutt
42a0796615 Squashed commit of the following:
sched/semaphore:  Add nxsem_post() which is identical to sem_post() except that it never modifies the errno variable.  Changed all references to sem_post in the OS to nxsem_post().

    sched/semaphore:  Add nxsem_destroy() which is identical to sem_destroy() except that it never modifies the errno variable.  Changed all references to sem_destroy() in the OS to nxsem_destroy().

    libc/semaphore and sched/semaphore:  Add nxsem_getprotocol() and nxsem_setprotocola which are identical to sem_getprotocol() and set_setprotocol() except that they never modifies the errno variable.  Changed all references to sem_setprotocol in the OS to nxsem_setprotocol().  sem_getprotocol() was not used in the OS
2017-10-03 15:35:24 -06:00
Gregory Nutt
6a3800f611 There can be a failure in IOB allocation to some asynchronous behavior caused by the use of sem_post(). Consider this scenario:
Task A holds an IOB.  There are no further IOBs.  The value of semcount is zero.
Task B calls iob_alloc().  Since there are not IOBs, it calls sem_wait().  The v
alue of semcount is now -1.

Task A frees the IOB.  iob_free() adds the IOB to the free list and calls sem_post() this makes Task B ready to run and sets semcount to zero NOT 1.  There is one IOB in the free list and semcount is zero.  When Task B wakes up it would increment the sem_count back to the correct value.

But an interrupt or another task runs occurs before Task B executes.  The interrupt or other tak takes the IOB off of the free list and decrements the semcount.  But since semcount is then < 0, this causes the assertion because that is an invalid state in the interrupt handler.

So I think that the root cause is that there the asynchrony between incrementing the semcount.  This change separates the list of IOBs:  Currently there is only a free list of IOBs.  The problem, I believe, is because of asynchronies due sem_post() post cause the semcount and the list content to become out of sync.  This change adds a new 'committed' list:  When there is a task waiting for an IOB, it will go into the committed list rather than the free list before the semaphore is posted.  On the waiting side, when awakened from the semaphore wait, it will expect to find its IOB in the committed list, rather than free list.

In this way, the content of the free list and the value of the semaphore count always remain in sync.
2017-05-16 11:03:35 -06:00
Gregory Nutt
2043e1a114 IOBs: Move from driver/iob to a better location in mm/iob 2017-05-09 07:35:30 -06:00