| .. |
|
a1x
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
arm
|
arch/arm: (1) Add semihost support for syslog, (2) Add semihost support for HostFS
|
2018-08-23 08:00:07 -06:00 |
|
armv6-m
|
arch/arm: (1) Add semihost support for syslog, (2) Add semihost support for HostFS
|
2018-08-23 08:00:07 -06:00 |
|
armv7-a
|
arch/arm: (1) Add semihost support for syslog, (2) Add semihost support for HostFS
|
2018-08-23 08:00:07 -06:00 |
|
armv7-m
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
armv7-r
|
arch/arm: (1) Add semihost support for syslog, (2) Add semihost support for HostFS
|
2018-08-23 08:00:07 -06:00 |
|
bcm2708
|
arch/: Clean up some naming and spacing.
|
2018-06-20 15:38:06 -06:00 |
|
c5471
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
dm320
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
efm32
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
imx1
|
i.MX6: Add IRQ header file
|
2016-02-28 14:07:53 -06:00 |
|
imx6
|
Fix lots of typos in C comments and Kconfig help text
|
2018-07-08 18:24:45 -06:00 |
|
imxrt
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
kinetis
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
kl
|
arch/: Clean up some naming and spacing.
|
2018-06-20 15:38:06 -06:00 |
|
lc823450
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
lpc11xx
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
lpc17xx
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
lpc31xx
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
lpc43xx
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
lpc54xx
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
lpc214x
|
Fix names of pre-processor variables used in header file idempotence
|
2016-08-06 18:48:45 -06:00 |
|
lpc2378
|
Fix names of pre-processor variables used in header file idempotence
|
2016-08-06 18:48:45 -06:00 |
|
max326xx
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
moxart
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
nrf52
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
nuc1xx
|
Cosmetic changes to spacing and comments.
|
2017-04-20 14:08:08 -06:00 |
|
sam34
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
sama5
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
samd2l2
|
Rename all usage of samdl/SAMDL to samd2l2/SAMD2L2 to make room in the name space for the forthcoming samd5e5/SAMD5E5
|
2018-07-22 15:54:12 -06:00 |
|
samd5e5
|
configs/metro-m4: Fix RxD interrupt pin selection. The number SERCOM interrupts do not refer to PAD numbers, but to bit positions in the INFLAG register (very tiny footnote in the data sheet). With with final fix, the basic NSH configuration appears fully functional.
|
2018-09-01 15:29:22 -06:00 |
|
samv7
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
stm32
|
Merged in raiden00/nuttx_pe (pull request #773)
|
2018-12-05 11:46:36 +00:00 |
|
stm32f0
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
stm32f7
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
stm32h7
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
stm32l4
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
str71x
|
Clean up and review of header files for conformance to standards
|
2015-06-12 19:26:01 -06:00 |
|
tiva
|
arch/arm/include/tiva/tm4c_irq.h: Fix a typo introduced in recent changes. Found in build testing.
|
2018-12-06 08:42:24 -06:00 |
|
tms570
|
arch/arm/include/tms570, arm/src/armv7-r, and arm/src/tms570: Adds support for the TMS570LS3137ZWT and corrects seversl ARMv7-R and TMS570 issues
|
2018-04-18 08:58:36 -06:00 |
|
xmc4
|
In the current implementation we only use very high priority interrupts (levels 0, 0x10 and 0x20 in CORTEX-M speak) but that means there are loads of lower priority ones that are effectively unused. I have *not* changed the semantics of these levels but have 'shifted' them to be based around the midpoint of the available interrupts (0x80) rather than at the top end....that allows for interrupts to be defined above (or, indeed, below) them as needed by the application. This should have no functional effect on existing code but adds in a clean capability to define higher priority interrupts.
|
2018-12-03 17:41:59 -06:00 |
|
.gitignore
|
Move LPC17xx IOCON register definitions from lpc17_gpio.h to lpc17_iocon.h; fix a few more .gitignore files
|
2013-04-04 18:12:44 -06:00 |
|
arch.h
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
elf.h
|
More trailing whilespace removal
|
2014-04-13 16:22:22 -06:00 |
|
inttypes.h
|
Add architecture-specific inttypes.h
|
2016-10-27 16:01:38 -04:00 |
|
irq.h
|
Squashed commit of the following:
|
2017-10-09 13:11:17 -06:00 |
|
limits.h
|
Make some file section headers more consistent with standard
|
2015-04-08 08:04:12 -06:00 |
|
serial.h
|
Make some file section headers more consistent with standard
|
2015-04-08 08:04:12 -06:00 |
|
spinlock.h
|
armv7-a, armv7-r, armv7-m: Add atomic read-add-write and read-subtract-write functions.
|
2018-02-04 12:22:03 -06:00 |
|
stdarg.h
|
Add a generic GCC stdarg.h header file
|
2012-07-08 14:50:43 +00:00 |
|
syscall.h
|
Standardize the width of all comment boxes in header files
|
2015-10-02 17:42:29 -06:00 |
|
tls.h
|
TLS: Forgot to add a file before last commit
|
2016-03-11 12:30:04 -06:00 |
|
types.h
|
Rename irqsave() and irqrestore() to up_irq_save() and up_irq_restore()
|
2016-02-14 16:11:25 -06:00 |
|
watchdog.h
|
Make some file section headers more consistent with standard
|
2015-04-08 08:04:12 -06:00 |
