When supporting high-priority interrupts, updating the
g_running_tasks within a high-priority interrupt may be
cause problems. The g_running_tasks should only be updated
when it is determined that a task context switch has occurred.
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
Remove TABs
Fix indentation
Fix Multi-line comments
Fix Comments to the Right of Statements.
Fix nuttx coding style
Fix Comments to the Right of Statements.
to avoid the infinite recusive dispatch:
*0 myhandler (signo=27, info=0xf3e38b9c, context=0x0) at ltp/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sigqueue/7-1.c:39
*1 0x58f1c39e in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:167
*2 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*3 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049334) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*4 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049334) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*5 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*6 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*7 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*8 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049304) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*9 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049304) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*10 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*11 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*12 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*13 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492d4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*14 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492d4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*15 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*16 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*17 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*18 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492a4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*19 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf40492a4) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*20 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*21 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*22 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*23 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049274) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*24 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049274) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*25 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*26 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
*27 0x58fa0664 in up_schedule_sigaction (tcb=0xf4e20f40, sigdeliver=0x58f1bab5 <nxsig_deliver>) at sim/sim_schedulesigaction.c:88
*28 0x58f19907 in nxsig_queue_action (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049244) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:115
*29 0x58f1b089 in nxsig_tcbdispatch (stcb=0xf4e20f40, info=0xf4049244) at signal/sig_dispatch.c:435
*30 0x58f31853 in nxsig_unmask_pendingsignal () at signal/sig_unmaskpendingsignal.c:104
*31 0x58f1ca09 in nxsig_deliver (stcb=0xf4e20f40) at signal/sig_deliver.c:199
Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
in SMP, signal processing cannot be nested, we use xcp.sigdeliver to identify whether there is currently a signal being processed, but this state does not match the actual situation
One possible scenario is that signal processing has already been completed, but an interrupt occurs, resulting in xcp.sigdeliver not being correctly set to NULL,
At this point, a new signal arrives, which can only be placed in the queue and cannot be processed immediately
Our solution is that signal processing and signal complete status are set in the same critical section, which can ensure status synchronization
Signed-off-by: hujun5 <hujun5@xiaomi.com>
1. Get the value of sp from dump regs when an exception occurs,
to avoid getting the value of fp from up_getsp and causing
incomplete stack printing.
2. Determine which stack the value belongs to based on the value
of SP to avoid false reports of stack overflow
Signed-off-by: zhangyuan21 <zhangyuan21@xiaomi.com>
It takes about 10 cycles to obtain the task list according to the task
status. In most cases, we know the task status, so we can directly
add the task from the specified task list to reduce time consuming.
It takes about 10 cycles to obtain the task list according to the task
status. In most cases, we know the task status, so we can directly
delete the task from the specified task list to reduce time consuming.
